...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of a Radiometric Procedure with Conventional Methods for Identification of Neisseria
【24h】

Comparison of a Radiometric Procedure with Conventional Methods for Identification of Neisseria

机译:放射线法与常规方法鉴定奈瑟氏菌的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A radiometric procedure was compared with the conventional cystine tryptic agar (CTA) sugar fermentation method for identification of Neisseria species. Four different ATCC cultures of Neisseria were identified by both procedures with identical results. The only difference noted was that the radiometric procedure required 3 h for completion, whereas the conventional CTA sugar method required overnight incubation. The radiometric procedure was also compared with the fluorescent antibody (FA) and CTA methods for identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The organisms examined were gram-negative, oxidase-positive diplococci isolated from 49 clinical specimens sent to the laboratory for bacteriological analysis. Results obtained by both CTA and FA procedures were comparable. However, the radioisotope method appeared to be superior to the other two methods in that only one isolate identified as positive by both the CTA and FA methods was not identified radiometrically, whereas four isolates positive by the radiometric method were not identified by the other two procedures. Thus, a total of seven more positive identifications were made radiometrically than by either of the two other methods. All positive identifications were confirmed by a reference laboratory. These results indicate that the radiometric procedure is more rapid and reliable as compared with both the CTA and direct FA methods and, thus, may serve as a valuable addition to the methodology available for diagnostic microbiology.
机译:将放射法与常规胱氨酸胰蛋白酶琼脂糖(CTA)糖发酵法进行了比较,以鉴定 Neisseria 菌种。通过两种方法鉴定到了四种 Neisseria 的ATCC培养物,结果相同。唯一注意到的区别是放射过程需要3小时才能完成,而常规CTA糖法需要过夜孵育。还将放射方法与荧光抗体(FA)和CTA方法进行了鉴定,以鉴定淋病奈瑟氏菌。被检查的生物是革兰氏阴性,氧化酶阳性双球菌,是从49个临床标本中分离出来的,这些标本被送往实验室进行细菌学分析。通过CTA和FA程序获得的结果是可比的。但是,放射性同位素方法似乎优于其他两种方法,因为只有一种被CTA和FA方法鉴定为阳性的分离物未通过放射线法鉴定,而通过射线法鉴定为阳性的四个分离物却未被其他两种方法鉴定。 。因此,与其他两种方法中的任何一种相比,在放射学上共进行了七次阳性识别。所有阳性识别均由参考实验室确认。这些结果表明,与CTA和直接FA方法相比,辐射过程更为快速和可靠,因此,可作为诊断微生物学方法学的宝贵补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号