...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Detection of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in enterococci other than Enterococcus faecalis.
【24h】

Detection of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in enterococci other than Enterococcus faecalis.

机译:在粪肠球菌以外的肠球菌中检测高水平的氨基糖苷抗性。

获取原文
           

摘要

The ability of six screening methods to detect high-level aminoglycoside resistance in enterococcal species other than Enterococcus faecalis was investigated. The 85 Enterococcus isolates, which included 55 E. faecium, 11 E. gallinarum, 9 E. casseliflavus, 5 E. raffinosus, 4 E. avium, and 1 E. mundtii, were tested by using aminoglycoside-supplemented brain heart infusion agar (BHI), Remel EF Synergy Quad plates, high-content aminoglycoside diffusion disks, standard (prepared in-house) microdilution panels, Pasco MIC Gram Positive microdilution panels, and Vitek GPS-TA cards. When tested on BHI, 32 and 35 strains showed resistance to gentamicin and streptomycin, respectively. Resistance profiles obtained with Remel EF Synergy Quad plates were in complete agreement with those obtained on BHI. However, growth on Mueller-Hinton agar-based plates was not as heavy. Some isolates showed only weak growth and required 48 h for resistance to become evident, especially with swab inoculation of quadrants containing 2,000 micrograms of gentamicin per ml. Profiles obtained by use of the agar-based screens were used as the basis for evaluating the other methods. Disk diffusion showed complete agreement. No false resistance occurred by either microdilution method, but 48 h of incubation was needed for detection of some gentamicin-resistant isolates, and 14% of the streptomycin-resistant strains were not detected by standard microdilution. The Vitek GPS-TA card detected 81 and 100% of the gentamicin- and streptomycin-resistant isolates, respectively. In general, most methods used to detect high-level aminoglycoside resistance in E. faecalis appear to be reliable for the testing of the other enterococcal species. However, further investigations with a greater number of resistant E. raffinosus, E. avium, and E. mundtii isolates, when they are available, will be useful for establishing the full range of enterococci that can reliably be tested by the various methods.
机译:研究了六种筛选方法在粪肠球菌以外的肠球菌中检测高水平氨基糖苷抗性的能力。使用补充氨基糖苷的脑心琼脂对85株肠球菌分离株进行了测试,其中包括55粪肠球菌,11。gallinarum,9 casseliflavus,5 E.raffinosus,4 E. avium和1 E.mundtii( BHI),Remel EF Synergy Quad板,高含量氨基糖苷扩散盘,标准(内部制备)微量稀释板,Pasco MIC Gram Positive微量稀释板和Vitek GPS-TA卡。在BHI上进行测试时,分别有32和35个菌株对庆大霉素和链霉素具有抗性。使用Remel EF Synergy Quad板获得的电阻曲线与通过BHI获得的电阻曲线完全一致。但是,在Mueller-Hinton琼脂基平板上的生长并不那么重。一些分离株仅表现出较弱的生长,并且需要48小时才能变得明显,尤其是用拭子接种每毫升含2,000微克庆大霉素的象限时。通过使用基于琼脂的筛选获得的轮廓被用作评估其他方法的基础。磁盘扩散显示完全一致。两种微量稀释方法均未发生假抗性,但需要48 h的孵育时间才能检测出一些对庆大霉素具有抗药性的菌株,而标准微稀释度未检测到14%的对链霉素具有抗性的菌株。 Vitek GPS-TA卡分别检测出81%和100%的抗庆大霉素和链霉素菌株。通常,大多数用于检测粪肠球菌中高水平氨基糖苷抗性的方法似乎对其他肠球菌物种的检测是可靠的。但是,如果有更多耐药性的葡萄球菌,鸟毛肠球菌和沙门氏菌分离株,则进一步的研究将有助于建立可通过各种方法可靠检测的完整范围的肠球菌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号