...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of three methods for grouping streptococci.
【24h】

Comparison of three methods for grouping streptococci.

机译:三种链球菌分组方法的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

Two new methods for serological grouping of beta-hemolytic streptococci, the nitrous acid extraction procedure of El Kholy et al. and the slide agglutination method of Christensen et al., were compared with the Lancefield hot-hydrochloric acid extraction method in classifying 92 strains of groups A, B, C, and G. The nitrous acid extraction method was easily performed, specific, and sensitive when highly potent antisera were used. For the Christensen method these highly potent antisera had to be diluted to avoid cross-reactions between groups A and C and groups B and G, respectively. A few strains, most of them group B, could not be grouped by the latter method. Using these three grouping methods, two sets of commercial sera were compared with the more potent sera supplied by R. C. Lancefield. The low antibody content of these commercial sera, especially anti-group B and G sera, contributed to the inferior results obtained in some of the grouping reactions.
机译:β-溶血性链球菌的血清学分组的两种新方法,El Kholy等人的亚硝酸提取方法。比较了Christensen等人的载玻片凝集法和Lancefield热盐酸提取法,对A,B,C和G组的92个菌株进行了分类。亚硝酸提取法操作简便,特异且灵敏当使用高效抗血清时。对于Christensen方法,必须稀释这些高效的抗血清,以避免分别在A组和C组与B组和G组之间发生交叉反应。少数菌株,其中大多数是B组,无法通过后一种方法进行分组。使用这三种分组方法,将两组商业血清与R. C. Lancefield提供的更有效的血清进行了比较。这些商业血清,特别是抗B和G型血清的抗体含量低,导致在某些分组反应中获得的结果较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号