...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of the Four-Hour Micro-ID Technique for Direct Identification of Oxidase-Negative, Gram-Negative Rods from Blood Cultures
【24h】

Evaluation of the Four-Hour Micro-ID Technique for Direct Identification of Oxidase-Negative, Gram-Negative Rods from Blood Cultures

机译:四小时Micro-ID技术用于直接鉴定血液培养物中氧化酶阴性,革兰氏阴性棒的评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A 4-h Micro-ID technique for direct identification of oxidase-negative gram-negative rods from positive blood cultures was compared to subculture and species identification of single colonies by API 20E and Micro-ID, using standardized inocula. A total of 127 patients (220 positive cultures) were studied. Isolates included 96 Escherichia coli, 46 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 7 Klebsiella oxytoca, 8 Enterobacter aerogenes, 17 Enterobacter cloacae, 19 Serratia marcescens, 2 Serratia liquefaciens, 8 Proteus mirabilis, 1 Salmonella species, 1 Morganella morganii, 6 Haemophilus influenzae, 2 Haemophilus parainfluenzae, 3 Bacteroides fragilis, 3 Acinetobacter calcoaceticus biotype anitratus, and 1 Pseudomonas maltophilia. In 90% of the cultures, identification by Micro-ID was identical to that obtained after subculture; if the 15 non-enterobacterial isolates were excluded, the corresponding figure was 96.6%. Enterobacteria identified incorrectly by direct Micro-ID were three S. marcescens (two identified as S. liquefaciens, one as Hafnia alvei), two S. liquefaciens (both identified as E. cloacae), and two K. pneumoniae (one identified as Klebsiella ozaenae, the other as Serratia rubidaea). None of the 15 non-enterobacterial cultures were correctly identified by Micro-ID (non-identifiable, or classified as Providencia/Yersinia/Klebsiella species). Although biochemical discrepancies between direct and final Micro-ID tests occurred in 41% of the enterobacterial cultures, this did not seriously interfere with identification. Direct species identification of Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures by direct Micro-ID is accurate and easily performed and identified organisms within 4 h compared to at least 24 h by most other methods; the direct Micro-ID technique would be rendered even more valuable by the additional capability of identifying non-enterobacterial gram-negative isolates.
机译:使用标准接种物,通过API 20E和Micro-ID将直接从阳性血液培养物中直接鉴定氧化酶阴性革兰氏阴性棒的4-h Micro-ID技术与继代培养和物种鉴定进行了比较。共研究了127名患者(220种阳性培养物)。分离株包括96株大肠杆菌,46株肺炎克雷伯菌,7株产氧克雷伯菌,8株产气肠杆菌,17株阴沟肠杆菌,粘质沙雷氏菌19种,液化沙雷氏菌2种,变形杆菌8种,沙门氏菌1种,沙门氏菌8种,1个摩根氏摩根大菌,6个流感嗜血杆菌,2个副流感嗜血杆菌,3个脆弱拟杆菌,3个不动杆菌calcoaceticus 生物型 anitratus 和1个 Pseudomonas maltophilia 。在90%的培养物中,通过Micro-ID进行的鉴定与继代培养后的鉴定相同;如果排除15株非细菌分离株,则相应数字为96.6%。通过直接Micro-ID错误识别的肠杆菌是三个 S。 marcescens (两个标识为 S。liquefaciens ,一个标识为 Hafnia alvei ),两个为 S。液化棉(均标识为阴沟肠杆菌)和两个 K。肺炎(一种称为克雷伯菌ozaenae ,另一种称为 Serratia rubidaea )。通过Micro-ID(无法识别或分类为 Providencia / Yersinia / Klebsiella 物种)正确识别了15种非细菌培养物。尽管直接和最终Micro-ID测试之间的生化差异发生在41%的肠细菌培养物中,但这并未严重干扰鉴定。通过直接Micro-ID从血液培养物中直接鉴定肠杆菌科是准确,容易进行的,并且在4小时内即可鉴定出生物,而大多数其他方法至少需要24小时。通过鉴定非细菌革兰氏阴性分离株的附加功能,直接的Micro-ID技术将变得更加有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号