...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Standardization of direct susceptibility test for blood cultures.
【24h】

Standardization of direct susceptibility test for blood cultures.

机译:血液培养的直接药敏试验的标准化。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Insufficient data are available to establish the reliability of direct disk diffusion susceptibility tests performed utilizing positive blood culture broth as inoculum. When Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used, 0.03 ml of turbid overnight blood culture broth was found to produce zone diameters closely approximating the size of diameters obtained by a standardized method. Results of direct (0.03 ml of inoculum) and standardized susceptibility tests were then compared for 116 positive blood cultures (1,069 individual disk comparisons). There were 1,011 test agreements (94.6%). There were also 48 (4.5%) minor discrepancies (change between sensitive and intermediate or between intermediate and resistant) and 10 (0.9%) major discrepancies (change between sensitive and resistant). The major discrepancies were randomly distributed among several organisms and antibiotics. Discrepancies occurred most frequently in the more clinically acceptable direction; i.e., in 79.3% the direct test indicted greater resistance than the standardized test. These data establish that 0.03 ml of turbid overnight blood culture broth produces results which compare closely to those obtained with standard methods, and in practice yield direct susceptibility results with a clinically acceptable level of reliability.
机译:没有足够的数据来建立使用阳性血液培养液作为接种物进行直接盘扩散敏感性试验的可靠性。当使用金黄色葡萄球菌ATCC 25923,大肠杆菌ATCC 25922和铜绿假单胞菌ATCC 27853时,发现0.03 ml混浊的过夜血液培养肉汤产生的区域直径非常接近通过标准化方法获得的直径大小。然后对116种阳性血液培养物(0.069 ml接种物)和标准化药敏试验的结果进行了比较(1,069个单独的磁盘比较)。有1,011个测试协议(占94.6%)。还存在48个(4.5%)轻微差异(敏感和中等之间或中间与耐药之间的变化)和10个(0.9%)主要差异(敏感和耐药之间的变化)。主要差异随机分布在几种生物和抗生素之间。差异最常见的是在临床上更容易接受的方向。也就是说,在79.3%的直接测试中,抵抗力比标准测试高。这些数据表明,0.03 ml的混浊的过夜血液培养液产生的结果与标准方法获得的结果非常接近,并且在实践中产生的直接敏感性结果具有临床上可接受的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号