...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Do ESP Students Prefer Face-to-Face Instruction Over Digitally Embedded Instruction? Blogs vs. Reports? Debates vs. Online Discussion?
【24h】

Do ESP Students Prefer Face-to-Face Instruction Over Digitally Embedded Instruction? Blogs vs. Reports? Debates vs. Online Discussion?

机译:ESP学生更喜欢面对面教学而不是数字嵌入式教学吗?博客还是报告?辩论与在线讨论?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper is a part of the PhD study carried at the South East European University in Macedonia. So far, no relevant research has been done with the students at the SEEU regarding their expanding preferences for both in-class learning and technological resources for learning English. The author has attempted to determine how the technology can be optimally used to improve students? English language learning and increase their motivation and participation. In order to conduct this research and gather useful results, combined qualitative and quantitative methods of data collection were used, such as classroom assignments, student questionnaires and structured interviews with randomly selected students. For the purpose of conducting the research one class of ESP students with compare-contrast types of digital literacy was used. The idea was for the author to create tasks that are similar but means to learning is different. This paper will focus on students? preferences in writing in-class reports vs. online blogs and in-class discussions vs. online discussions done in the SEEU's LMS. Instructors can provide the most beneficial learning environment for their students if they understand whether students prefer a digital learning environment, either in some situations, not at all, or always. The expected conclusions of the proposed study are as follows: 1. It is difficult to prove a statement that digital learning is always as effective as in-class instruction is. 2. The digital learning depends a great deal on students? initiative and motivation.
机译:本文是马其顿东南大学进行的博士学位研究的一部分。到目前为止,尚未针对SEEU的学生就他们对课堂学习和学习英语的技术资源的偏爱进行任何相关研究。作者试图确定如何最佳地使用该技术来提高学生水平?学习英语并增加他们的动力和参与度。为了进行这项研究并收集有用的结果,使用了定性和定量相结合的数据收集方法,例如课堂作业,学生问卷和对随机选择的学生的结构化访谈。为了进行研究,使用了一类具有对比类型的数字素养的ESP学生。作者的想法是创建相似但任务不同的任务。本文将针对学生吗?在SEEU的LMS中编写课堂报告与在线博客,课堂讨论与在线讨论的偏好。如果教师了解学生在某些情况下,根本不喜欢或始终喜欢数字学习环境,则可以为他们的学生提供最有益的学习环境。拟议研究的预期结论如下:1.很难证明数字学习总是和课堂教学一样有效。 2.数字学习在很大程度上取决于学生吗?主动性和动机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号