...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources >Evaluating and Comparing Some of the Quantitative Risk Analysis Methods to Estimate Design Flood of Dam Spillway (Case Study: Pishin Dam Spillway)
【24h】

Evaluating and Comparing Some of the Quantitative Risk Analysis Methods to Estimate Design Flood of Dam Spillway (Case Study: Pishin Dam Spillway)

机译:评估和比较一些定量风险分析方法,以估算大坝溢洪道的设计洪水(案例研究:Pishin大坝溢洪道)

获取原文
           

摘要

Overtopping is one of the main factors responsible for dam failure. To avoid overtopping, dam is equipped with one or some spillways to release the water impounded in the reservoir. The number and size of these spillways are determined on the basis of design flood. Determination of design flood of dam spillway can be formulated as a multiobjective risk problem. This problem can be solved by Quantitative Risk Analysis Methods. Here, four economical design methods which are based on risk analysis including, United States National Research Council (NRC), US Civil Engineering, Unit Curve and Partitioned Multiobjective Risk (PMR) were studied. In order to compare these methods, Risk Analysis was performed for re-determining design flood of Pishin Dam Spillway. This Dam has been constructed on the Sarbaz River. Owing to the fact that the integrals of the expected damage relations in the two methods, i.e., Civil Engineering, and Partitioned Multiobjective Risk are analytically unsolvable, Romberg numerical integration technique and Excel software were utilized for the related calculations and drawing graphs. Also, in order to select suitable distribution, the flood analysis was done using Smada software. The findings of the study indicated that design flood determined by the three methods, i.e., Civil Engineering, National Research Council and Unit Curve was almost the same, and that the amount of flood was less than the 10,000-year-old flood while design flood determined by Partitioned Multiobjective Risk Method, was larger than the 10,000- year-old flood. Keywords: Quantitative risk analysis, Spillway, Design flood, Pishin Dam. Full-Text Type of Study: Research | Subject: Ggeneral Received: 2010/06/16 Related Websites Scientific Publications Commission - Health Ministry Scientific Publications Commission - Science Ministry Yektaweb Company Site Keywords ?????, Academic Journal, Scientific Article, ???? ????? ??, ???? ????? ??, ???? ????? ??, ???? ????? ??, ???? ????? ??, ???? ????? ??, ???? ?? Vote ? 2015 All Rights Reserved | JWSS - Isfahan University of Technology
机译:翻倒是造成大坝破坏的主要因素之一。为避免过高,大坝装有一个或一些溢洪道,以释放积蓄在水库中的水。这些溢洪道的数量和大小是根据设计洪水确定的。大坝溢洪道设计洪水的确定可以表述为多目标风险问题。此问题可以通过定量风险分析方法解决。在这里,研究了基于风险分析的四种经济设计方法,包括美国国家研究委员会(NRC),美国土木工程,单位曲线和分区多目标风险(PMR)。为了比较这些方法,进行了风险分析以重新确定皮申大坝溢洪道的设计洪水。该水坝建在萨尔巴兹河上。由于土木工程和分区多目标风险这两种方法的预期损害关系的积分在分析上无法解决,因此使用Romberg数值积分技术和Excel软件进行了相关的计算和绘制图形。此外,为了选择合适的分布,使用Smada软件进行了洪水分析。研究结果表明,由土木工程,国家研究委员会和单位曲线这三种方法确定的设计洪水几乎相同,并且设计洪水时的洪水量少于10,000年的洪水通过分区多目标风险方法确定的结果大于10,000年的洪水。关键字:定量风险分析,溢洪道,设计洪水,皮申大坝。全文研究类型:研究|主题:一般收稿日期:2010/06/16相关网站科学出版物委员会-卫生部科学出版物委员会-科学部Yektaweb公司网站关键字??????,Academic Journal,Scientific Article,???? ?????? ??,???? ?????? ??,???? ?????? ??,???? ?????? ??,???? ?????? ??,???? ?????? ??,???? ??投票吗? 2015版权所有| JWSS-伊斯法罕工业大学

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号