首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology >Comparison and evaluation of several models in prediction of asphaltene deposition profile along an oil well: a case study
【24h】

Comparison and evaluation of several models in prediction of asphaltene deposition profile along an oil well: a case study

机译:几种模型在油井沥青质沉积剖面预测中的比较与评价:一个案例研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Deposition of asphaltenes on the inner surface of oil wells and pipelines causes flow blockage or significant production loss in these conduits. Generally, asphaltenes are stable in reservoir condition; however, change in pressure, temperature, and composition can trigger phase separation and then deposition of asphaltene along the flow stream. Therefore, it is required to identify the possibility of asphaltene precipitation and accurately quantify deposition tendency of these heavy organic molecules. This work is aimed at detailed assessment of the predictive capability of five deposition models available in the literature for calculating the magnitude and profile of asphaltene deposition in wellbores. To end this, firstly we discuss and describe these five models known as Friedlander and Johnstone (Ind Eng Chem 49:1151–1156, 1957), Beal (Nucl Sci Eng 40:1–11, 1970), Escobedo and Mansoori (SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 1995), Cleaver and Yates (Chem Eng Sci 30:983–992, 1975), and Jamialahmadi et al. (Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:4624–4634, 2009). Afterward, thermodynamic modeling of live oil and a wellbore P–T relationship of the flowing fluid were used in a graphical method in order to identify asphaltene precipitation zone along axial wellbore length. Then, the five models were applied to the wellbore to forecast the deposition tendency of precipitated asphaltene particles and to obtain a profile of deposited asphaltenes. Most importantly, a measured deposit profile of the investigated wellbore enabled us to select the most accurate one for estimating the asphaltene deposition rate. The validation method presented in this work reveals that Cleaver and Yates (1975), Jamialahmadi et al. (2009), and Escobedo and Mansoori (1995) models have a satisfactory performance in predicting asphaltene deposition profile along the wellbore when compared to caliper measurement of the well.
机译:沥青质在油井和管道内表面上的沉积会导致这些管道中的流量阻塞或大量生产损失。通常,沥青质在储层条件下是稳定的。但是,压力,温度和组成的变化会触发相分离,然后沿流动流沉积沥青质。因此,需要确定沥青质沉淀的可能性,并准确地量化这些重有机分子的沉积趋势。这项工作旨在详细评估文献中可用的五个沉积模型的预测能力,这些模型可用于计算井眼中沥青质沉积的幅度和剖面。为此,首先,我们讨论并描述这五个模型,分别称为Friedlander和Johnstone(Ind Eng Chem 49:1151-1156,1957),Beal(Nucl Sci Eng 40:1-11-1,1970),Escobedo和Mansoori(SPE年会技术会议和展览,1995年),Cleaver和Yates(Chem Eng Sci 30:983–992,1975年)和Jamialahmadi等人。 (Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:4624-4634,2009)。此后,以图形方法使用了活油的热力学模型和流动流体的井眼PT关系,以识别沿轴向井眼长度的沥青质沉淀区。然后,将这五个模型应用于井眼,以预测沉淀的沥青质颗粒的沉积趋势,并获得沉积沥青质的剖面。最重要的是,所测井筒的测量沉积剖面使我们能够选择最准确的剖面来估算沥青质的沉积速率。这项工作提出的验证方法表明,Cleaver和Yates(1975),Jamialahmadi等人。 (2009年)以及Escobedo和Mansoori(1995年)模型与井径测量相比,在预测沿井眼的沥青质沉积剖面方面具有令人满意的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号