首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology >Integrated production logging tools approach for convenient experimental individual layer permeability measurements in a multi-layered fractured reservoir
【24h】

Integrated production logging tools approach for convenient experimental individual layer permeability measurements in a multi-layered fractured reservoir

机译:集成的生产测井工具方法可在多层裂缝性油藏中方便地进行实验性单层渗透率测量

获取原文
           

摘要

Appropriate estimation of permeability is considered as one of the significant concerns of petroleum industries. Due to the growing demand for hydrocarbon fossil fuels in numerous industries, Petroleum Engineers always try to provide holistic and sustainable solutions to measure this parameter more accurately and to calculate the proper original oil in place (OOIP) and initial reserve. Hence, this accuracy estimation helps engineers whether the production and exploration operations are profitable or not and it might virtually eliminate the unnecessary expenditures. The term production logging tools (henceforth; PLT) involve a wide variety of measurement tools and many sensors. It, too, carries interpretation tools which evaluate the formation properties, in respect of the way PLTs would analyze the formation fluid movements inside and outside of the wellbore and subsequently estimate the production flow rate for each layer. On the other hand, it gives production and completion engineers the chance to investigate the appropriate efficiency of production and perforation processes to organize the remediation methodologies or preplan proper designing for modifying completion procedures which have based on the production logging tools interpretation. The purpose of this comprehensive research is to compare two different techniques (PLT and core analysis) of permeability measurement in a six-layered fractured reservoir and subsequently normalize each parameter to obtain the proper estimation. As a result, according to the evaluation of each technique, the amount of permeability in the layers 1, 2, 3, and 5 is relatively close to each other. Furthermore, regarding higher expenses of core analysis tests and the reliability of PLTs according to the results of this paper in the four out of six individual layers, Emeraude software by utilizing PLT interpretation could be a substitution and preferable methodology instead of core analysis measurements.
机译:对渗透率的适当估计被认为是石油工业的重要问题之一。由于许多行业对碳氢化合物化石燃料的需求不断增长,石油工程师始终试图提供整体和可持续的解决方案,以更准确地测量此参数并计算适当的原始石油(OOIP)和初始储量。因此,这种准确性估算可帮助工程师进行生产和勘探运营是否有利可图,并且实际上可以消除不必要的支出。生产测井工具(此后称为PLT)一词涉及多种测量工具和许多传感器。它还带有解释工具,这些解释工具就PLT分析井眼内外的地层流体运动并随后估算每一层的生产速率的方式来评估地层特性。另一方面,它使生产和完井工程师有机会研究适当的生产和射孔工艺效率,以组织补救方法或预先计划适当的设计,以修改完井程序,这些方法基于生产测井工具的解释。这项全面研究的目的是比较六层裂缝性储层中两种不同的渗透率测量技术(PLT和岩心分析),然后对每个参数进行归一化以获得正确的估计。结果,根据每种技术的评估,层1、2、3和5中的渗透性的量彼此相对接近。此外,根据本文的结果,在六个独立的层中的四个中,关于核心分析测试的较高费用和PLT的可靠性,利用PLT解释的Emeraude软件可以替代核心分析测量,并且是更可取的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号