...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment >Wildlife crop depredation in the Luangwa Valley, eastern Zambia
【24h】

Wildlife crop depredation in the Luangwa Valley, eastern Zambia

机译:赞比亚东部卢安瓜河谷的野生生物作物遭掠夺

获取原文
           

摘要

Wildlife crop raiding was assessed in six chiefdoms of the Luangwa Valley, eastern Zambia between 2004 and 2008 to establish nature and extent of wildlife crop degredation and examine the impact of existing mitigation measures being implemented to deter wildlife crop raiding. Crop damage assessments, involving crop quality, stage of growth and proportion of crop damage, were conducted using six trained field enumerators. Structured questionnaires were administered randomly to local farmers that were inflicted by wildlife crop raiders to elucidate on-farm deterrence measures. Eleven species of wildlife were identified as ‘problem animals’: African elephant (Loxodonta africana), Hippopotamus(Hippopotamus amphibius), Bushpig?(Potamochoerus larvatus), Yellow baboon?(Papio cynocephalus), Porcupine?(Hystrix africaeaustralis), African civet?(Civetta civetta), Roan antelope?(Hippotragus equinus), Lesser kudu?(Tragelaphus strepsiceros), Eland(Taurotragus oryx), Cape buffalo?(Syncerus caffer)?and Warthog?(Phacochoerus africanus). Results showed that African elephant caused the most damage,? 67.82 and 98.41% of total wet and dry farming crop raiding incidences respectively, which occurred at crop maturity between February and April.?Maize (Zea mays) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) were the most affected crops by problem animals, associated with 71.38 and 42.86% of the total crop raids in wet and dry farming seasons respectively.?Frequency and extent of damages depended on deterrence measure applied on the crop fields. Of the six chiefdoms, in Malama chiefdom where solar powered electric fences and?Capsicum?fences were implemented, there were few and less intensive incursions. Based on the findings, we suggest development of capacity for local farmers in effective wildlife crop mitigation measures, particularly against African elephants. Future research would require determining uptake by local farmers and efficacy of novel counter-measures.
机译:在2004年至2008年之间,对赞比亚东部卢安瓜山谷的六个酋长国进行了野生动植物掠夺评估,以查明野生动植物退化的性质和程度,并研究为减轻野生动植物袭击而实施的现有缓解措施的影响。使用六个训练有素的田间调查员进行了包括作物质量,生长阶段和作物危害比例在内的作物危害评估。结构化的调查问卷被随机分发给当地农民,这些农民受到野生动植物入侵者的袭击,以阐明农场的威慑措施。有11种野生动物被确认为“问题动物”:非洲象(Loxodonta africana),河马(Hippopotamus amphibius),Bushpig?(Potamochoerus larvatus),黄狒狒?(Papio cynocephalus),豪猪(豪猪)(Hystrix africaveteaualis),非洲象(Civetta civetta),Roan羚羊(Hippotragus equinus),Lerth kudu(Tragelaphus strepsiceros),Eland(Taurotragus oryx),Cape Buffalo?(Syncerus caffer)和Warthog?(Phacochoerus africanus)。结果表明,非洲象造成的伤害最大?分别发生在2月和4月的成熟期,分别占湿,干农作物袭击总发生率的67.82%和98.41%。玉米(Zea mays)和棉花(Gossypium hirsutum)是受问题动物影响最大的作物,与71.38和90。旱季和旱季的农作物袭击分别占总袭击的42.86%。损害的频率和程度取决于对农田的威慑措施。在六个酋长国中,在实行太阳能电围栏和“辣椒”篱笆的马拉马酋长国中,密集的入侵几乎没有,也没有那么密集。根据调查结果,我们建议当地农民采取有效的缓解野生动植物的措施,特别是针对非洲象的能力。未来的研究将需要确定当地农民的摄取量以及新颖对策的功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号