...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conservative Dentistry >Marginal sealing ability of silorane and methacrylate resin composites in class II cavities: A scanning electron microscopic study
【24h】

Marginal sealing ability of silorane and methacrylate resin composites in class II cavities: A scanning electron microscopic study

机译:硅酮和甲基丙烯酸酯树脂复合材料在II类腔中的边缘密封能力:扫描电子显微镜研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim and Objectives:To comparatively evaluate the microleakage and microgap formation along the gingival margin in class II cavities restored with silorane resin composite and methacrylate resin composite with and without flowable resin liner.Materials and Methods:Sixty human mandibular premolars were distributed into three groups, each group containing 20 teeth (n = 20). Mesial (subgroup A) and distal (subgroup B) box cavities were prepared with gingival margin above and below cemento enamel junction (CEJ), respectively, in each tooth and restored as follows — Group I — Silorane resin composite with self-etch primer and bond (Filtek P90, 3M ESPE MN, USA). Group II — Methacrylate resin composite (Filtek P60, 3M ESPE MN, USA) and self-etch adhesive (Adper Easy one, 3M ESPE MN, USA). Group III — Methacrylate resin composite with self-etch adhesive and a flowable resin liner (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M ESPE MN, USA). The teeth were thermocycled and immersed in 50% silver nitrate solution before sectioning. The specimens were observed under scanning electron microscope for dye penetration and microgap formation. The data was subjected to statistical analysis using Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test using SPSS version 18.Results:Subgroup A in all the three groups showed significantly less microleakage and microgap formation compared to subgroup B with P < 0.05.Intergroup comparison of subgroup A did not show statistically significant difference, whereas subgroup B showed statistically significant difference for microleakage between group I and group II (P = 0.003), group III and group II (P = 0.002).Conclusion:Silorane resin composite and methacrylate resin with liner showed significantly less microleakage in class II cavities along the gingival margin placed below CEJ compared to methacrylate resin without liner. All the study groups showed less microleakage and microgap formation along the gingival margin placed above CEJ.
机译:目的与目的:比较评价在有和无流动衬里的情况下,用硅氧烷树脂复合材料和甲基丙烯酸酯树脂复合材料修复的Ⅱ类牙腔中沿牙龈缘的微渗漏和微间隙的形成。材料与方法:将60只人类下颌前磨牙分为三组,每组包含20颗牙齿(n = 20)。在每个牙齿中分别制备中齿(A组)和远端(B组)的牙龈边缘,分别位于牙釉质釉质连接处(CEJ)上方和下方,并恢复如下:-I组-具有自蚀刻底漆的Silorane树脂复合材料和债券(Filtek P90,3M ESPE MN,美国)。第II组-甲基丙烯酸酯树脂复合材料(Filtek P60,美国3M ESPE MN)和自蚀刻胶粘剂(Adper Easy one,美国3M ESPE MN)。第III组-具有自蚀刻粘合剂和可流动树脂衬里的甲基丙烯酸酯树脂复合材料(Filtek Z350 XT,3M ESPE MN,美国)。将牙齿热循环并在切片前浸入50%硝酸银溶液中。在扫描电子显微镜下观察样品的染料渗透和微间隙形成。数据使用SPSS版本18的Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。结果:三组中的A组与B组相比,其微渗漏和微间隙形成显着减少,P <0.05。 I组和II组(P = 0.003),III组和II组(P = 0.002)之间的微渗漏差异无统计学意义,而B组则具有统计学意义。与不带衬垫的甲基丙烯酸酯树脂相比,带衬垫的II类空腔沿CEJ下方的牙龈边缘的微泄漏明显更少。所有研究组均显示CEJ上方沿牙龈边缘的微渗漏和微间隙形成较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号