...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Atrial Fibrillation >Thromboembolic Outcomes of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Thromboembolic Outcomes of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review

机译:肥厚型心肌病患者房颤患者不同抗凝策略的血栓栓塞结果:系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Current guidelines recommend use of anticoagulation (AC) to prevent thromboembolic events for patients who develop atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of different AC strategies for prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and mortality in patients with HCM and AF. Methods: Electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles through February of 2019. Studies assessing outcomes of interest in patients with HCM and AF receiving AC versus no AC or novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were selected. Risk ratios (RRs) were computed through RevMan 5.3.5 for display within forest plots. Results: This analysis identified 13 observational studies evaluating 6,082 participants. Use of AC was associated with a statistically significant reduction in thromboembolic events (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.92; p = 0.02) compared to no AC. Furthermore, use of NOACs versus VKAs led to a statistically significant reduction in the incidence rate of combined adverse outcomes of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and mortality (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.85, p = 0.02). While subgroup analyses demonstrated NOACs to be statistically superior to VKAs regarding reduction in the rates of major bleeding (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88, p = 0.004) and mortality (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.71, p = 0.01), there was no difference in the incidence rate of thromboembolic events (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.28-1.25, p = 0.17) between the two AC strategies. Conclusions: This study supports existing literature suggesting AC is warranted for all patients with HCM and AF. It also demonstrates NOACs may be preferential to VKAs in this subpopulation regarding major bleeding and mortality.
机译:背景:目前的指南建议,对于肥厚型心肌病(HCM)发生房颤(AF)的患者,应使用抗凝(AC)预防血栓栓塞事件。目的:评估不同AC策略预防HCM和AF患者血栓栓塞事件,大出血和死亡率的有效性和安全性。方法:在2019年2月之前搜索PubMed,EMBASE,Scopus和Google Scholar的电子数据库中的相关文章。研究评估了接受AC与不接受AC或新型口服抗凝剂(NOAC)和维生素K的HCM和AF患者的关注结果选择拮抗剂(VKA)。通过RevMan 5.3.5计算了风险比(RR),以在林区内显示。结果:这项分析确定了13项观察性研究,评估了6,082名参与者。与不使用AC相比,使用AC可显着减少血栓栓塞事件(RR 0.57,95%CI 0.36-0.92; p = 0.02)。此外,使用NOAC与VKA相比,血栓栓塞事件,严重出血和死亡率的综合不良结局的发生率在统计学上显着降低(RR 0.40,95%CI 0.19-0.85,p = 0.02)。虽然亚组分析显示,在减少大出血率(RR 0.67,95%CI 0.51-0.88,p = 0.004)和死亡率(RR 0.19,95%CI 0.05-0.71,p = 0.01)方面,NOAC在统计学上优于VKA。 ),两种AC策略之间的血栓栓塞事件发生率没有差异(RR 0.59,95%CI 0.28-1.25,p = 0.17)。结论:这项研究支持现有的文献,提示所有患有HCM和AF的患者均应行AC治疗。这也表明在主要出血和死亡率方面,NOACs在这一亚人群中可能比VKAs更受青睐。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号