首页> 外文期刊>Dental Materials Journal >Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning
【24h】

Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning

机译:通过传统的印模/塑模模型方法和口腔内扫描产生的数字模型的准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

We compared the accuracy of digital models generated by desktop-scanning of conventional impression/plaster models versus intraoral scanning. Eight ceramic spheres were attached to the buccal molar regions of dental epoxy models, and reference linear-distance measurement were determined using a contact-type coordinate measuring instrument. Alginate (AI group) and silicone (SI group) impressions were taken and converted into cast models using dental stone; the models were scanned using desktop scanner. As an alternative, intraoral scans were taken using an intraoral scanner, and digital models were generated from these scans (IOS group). Twelve linear-distance measurement combinations were calculated between different sphere-centers for all digital models. There were no significant differences among the three groups using total of six linear-distance measurements. When limited to five lineardistance measurement, the IOS group showed significantly higher accuracy compared to the AI and SI groups. Intraoral scans may be more accurate compared to scans of conventional impression/plaster models.
机译:我们比较了通过传统印象/石膏模型的桌面扫描与口内扫描生成的数字模型的准确性。将八个陶瓷球附着到牙科环氧模型的颊磨牙区域,并使用接触式坐标测量仪确定参考线性距离测量值。拍摄藻酸盐(AI组)和硅酮(SI组)印模,并使用牙石将其转换为铸模;使用台式扫描仪扫描模型。或者,使用口内扫描仪进行口内扫描,然后从这些扫描生成数字模型(IOS组)。对于所有数字模型,在不同球心之间计算了十二种线性距离测量组合。使用总共六个线性距离测量值,三组之间没有显着差异。当限于五个线性距离测量时,与AI和SI组相比,IOS组显示出明显更高的精度。与常规印模/灰泥模型的扫描相比,口内扫描可能更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号