首页> 外文期刊>Head Face Medicine >Comparative three-dimensional analysis of initial biofilm formation on three orthodontic bracket materials
【24h】

Comparative three-dimensional analysis of initial biofilm formation on three orthodontic bracket materials

机译:三种正畸支架材料上初始生物膜形成的比较三维分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction The purpose of the present study was to investigate and compare early biofilm formation on biomaterials, which are being used in contemporary fixed orthodontic treatment. Methods This study comprised 10 healthy volunteers (5 females and 5 males) with a mean age of 27.3?+–3.7 years. Three slabs of different orthodontic materials (stainless steel, gold and ceramic) were placed in randomized order on a splint in the mandibular molar region. Splints were inserted intraorally for 48 h. Then the slabs were removed from the splints and the biofilms were stained with a two color fluorescence assay for bacterial viability (LIVE/DEAD BacLight–Bacterial Viability Kit 7012, Invitrogen, Mount Waverley, Australia). The quantitative biofilm formation was analyzed by using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Results The biofilm coverage was 32.7?±?37.7% on stainless steel surfaces, 59.5?±?40.0% on gold surfaces and 56.8?±?43.6% on ceramic surfaces. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in biofilm coverage between the tested materials (p=0.033). The Wilcoxon test demonstrated significantly lower biofilm coverage on steel compared to gold (p=0.011). Biofilm height on stainless steel surfaces was 4.0?±?7.3 μm, on gold surfaces 6.0?±?6.6 μm and on ceramic 6.5?±?6.0 μm. The Friedman test revealed no significant differences between the tested materials (p=0.150). Pairwise comparison demonstrated significant differences between stainless steel and gold (p=0.047). Conclusion Our results indicate that initial biofilm formation seemed to be less on stainless steel surfaces compared with other traditional materials in a short-term observation. Future studies should examine whether there is a difference in long-term biofilm accumulation between stainless steel, gold and ceramic brackets.
机译:引言本研究的目的是研究和比较在现代固定正畸治疗中使用的生物材料上的早期生物膜形成。方法该研究包括10名健康志愿者(5名女性和5名男性),平均年龄为27.3?+ – 3.7岁。将三个不同正畸材料(不锈钢,金和陶瓷)的平板以随机顺序放置在下颌磨牙区的夹板上。将夹板口内插入48小时。然后从夹板上取下平板,并用双色荧光分析法对生物膜染色以测定细菌的生存力(LIVE / DEAD BacLight–细菌生存力试剂盒7012,Invitrogen,Mount Waverley,澳大利亚)。通过使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)分析定量生物膜的形成。结果生物膜在不锈钢表面的覆盖率为32.7±37.7%,在金表面的覆盖率为59.5±40.0%,在陶瓷表面的覆盖率为56.8±43.6%。统计分析表明,被测材料之间的生物膜覆盖率存在显着差异(p = 0.033)。 Wilcoxon试验表明,与金相比,钢上的生物膜覆盖率显着降低(p = 0.011)。不锈钢表面的生物膜高度为4.0±±7.3μm,金表面的生物膜高度为6.0±±6.6μm,陶瓷的生物膜高度为6.5±±6.0μm。弗里德曼检验表明,被测材料之间无显着差异(p = 0.150)。成对比较表明不锈钢和金之间存在显着差异(p = 0.047)。结论我们的结果表明,在短期观察中,与其他传统材料相比,不锈钢表面的初始生物膜形成似乎更少。未来的研究应检查不锈钢,金和陶瓷支架之间的长期生物膜积累是否存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号