首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Increasing follow-up questionnaire response rates in a randomized controlled trial of telehealth for depression: three embedded controlled studies
【24h】

Increasing follow-up questionnaire response rates in a randomized controlled trial of telehealth for depression: three embedded controlled studies

机译:在一项针对抑郁症的远程医疗随机对照试验中,增加随访问卷的回应率:三项嵌入式对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Attrition is problematic in trials, and may be exacerbated in longer studies, telehealth trials and participants with depression – three features of The Healthlines Study. Advance notification, including a photograph and using action-oriented email subject lines might increase response rates, but require further investigation. We examined the effectiveness of these interventions in three embedded Healthlines studies. Methods Based in different trial sites, participants with depression were alternately allocated to be pre-called or not ahead of the 8-month follow-up questionnaire (Study 1), randomized to receive a research team photograph or not with their 12-month questionnaire (Study 2), and randomized to receive an action-oriented (‘ACTION REQUIRED’) or standard (‘Questionnaire reminder’) 12-month email reminder (Study 3). Participants could complete online or postal questionnaires, and received up to five questionnaire reminders. The primary outcome was completion of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Secondary outcome measures were the number of reminders and time to questionnaire completion. Results Of a total of 609 Healthlines depression participants, 190, 251 and 231 participants were included in Studies 1–3 (intervention: 95, 126 and 115), respectively. Outcome completion was ≥90?% across studies, with no differences between trial arms (Study 1: OR 0.38, 95?% CI 0.07–2.10; Study 2: OR 0.84, 95?% CI 0.26–2.66; Study 3: OR 0.53 95?% CI 0.19–1.49). Pre-called participants were less likely to require a reminder (48.4?% vs 62.1?%, OR 0.41, 95?% CI 0.21–0.78), required fewer reminders (adjusted difference in means ?0.67, 95?% CI ?1.13 to ?0.20), and completed follow-up quicker (median 8 vs 15?days, HR 1.35, 95?% CI 1.00–1.82) than control subjects. There were no significant between-group differences in Studies 2 or 3. Conclusions Eventual response rates in this trial were high, with no further improvement from these interventions. While the photograph and email interventions were ineffective, pre-calling participants reduced time to completion. This strategy might be helpful when the timing of study completion is important. Researchers perceived a substantial benefit from the reduction in reminders with pre-calling, despite no overall decrease in net effort after accounting for pre-notification. Trial registration Current Clinical Trials ISRCTN14172341
机译:背景损耗在试验中是有问题的,并且在更长的研究,远程医疗试验和患有抑郁症的参与者中可能会加剧,这是“健康线”研究的三个特征。预先通知(包括照片和使用面向行动的电子邮件主题行)可能会提高答复率,但需要进行进一步调查。我们在三项嵌入式Healthlines研究中检查了这些干预措施的有效性。方法根据不同的试验地点,在8个月的随访问卷(研究1)之前,将抑郁症患者交替分配为被叫或不叫,被随机分配以接受研究团队的照片或不提供其12个月的问卷(研究2),并随机接收面向行动(“需要采取行动”)或标准(“问卷提醒”)的12个月电子邮件提醒(研究3)。参与者可以完成在线或邮政调查表,并收到多达五个调查表提醒。主要结果是完成患者健康调查表(PH​​Q-9)。次要结果指标是提醒次数和完成问卷的时间。结果总共609名健康线抑郁症参与者中,研究1-3(干预:95、126和115)分别包括190、251和231名参与者。在各研究中,结果完成率≥90%,各试验组之间无差异(研究1:OR 0.38,95%CI 0.07–2.10;研究2:OR 0.84,95%CI 0.26-2.66;研究3:OR 0.53 95%CI(0.19–1.49)。预先提醒的参与者不太可能需要提醒(48.4%vs 62.1%,或0.41,95%CI 0.21-0.78),需要更少的提醒(均值校正后的差异为0.67,95%CI为1.13至[0.20],并且完成追踪的时间比对照组快(中位数8天比15天,HR 1.35,95%CI 1.00-1.82)。在研究2或3中,组间无显着差异。结论结论该试验的最终缓解率很高,这些干预措施没有进一步改善。尽管照片和电子邮件干预效果不佳,但致电前参与者减少了完成时间。当研究完成的时间很重要时,该策略可能会有所帮助。研究人员认为,尽管考虑了预通知后,净工作量并未总体减少,但预呼叫的提醒减少却带来了很大的好处。试验注册当前临床试验ISRCTN14172341

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号