...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >High-dose intravenously administered iron versus orally administered iron in blood donors with iron deficiency: study protocol for a randomised, controlled trial
【24h】

High-dose intravenously administered iron versus orally administered iron in blood donors with iron deficiency: study protocol for a randomised, controlled trial

机译:缺铁献血者中大剂量静脉内铁剂与口服铁剂的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background About 2–3?% of the population participates in blood donation programmes. Each whole blood donation or ten apheresis donations cause a loss of 200–250?mg of iron. As a result, one of the most common risks of regular blood donors is iron deficiency. Although this has been known for decades, in most countries, iron status is currently not assessed or treated in this population. Premenopausal women are particularly affected, as they have lower iron reserves and higher daily requirements. Besides anaemia, iron deficiency may lead to fatigue and impaired cognitive and physical performance. Current iron preparations for intravenous administration are well tolerated and allow for application of large doses up to 1?g in one visit. Our hypothesis is that in blood donors with iron deficiency, intravenously administered iron is more efficient and as safe as oral iron supplementation. Since anaemia is one of the most frequent reasons for permanent or intermittent donor deferral, maintaining an iron-replete donor pool may help to prevent shortages in blood supply and to avoid iron deficiency-related comorbidities. Methods/design In this randomised clinical trial we include male and female blood donors aged ≥18 and ≤65?years with a ferritin value of ≤30?ng/ml. Stratified by gender, participants are randomized with a web-based randomisation tool in a 1:1 ratio to either 1?g of intravenously administered ferric carboxymaltose or 10?g of iron fumarate supplements at one to two daily doses of 100?mg each. Eight to 12?weeks after the first visit, iron status, blood count and symptoms are assessed in both groups. The primary endpoint is the difference in transferrin saturation (%) following the intervention between both groups. Secondary endpoints include other parameters of iron metabolism and red blood cell count, the number of patients with drug-related adverse events, and subjective symptoms including those of the restless legs syndrome, quality of life, and fatigue. Discussion Iron supplementation administered intravenously in non-anaemic but iron-deficient blood donors could represent an effective strategy to protect blood donors from comorbidities related with iron deficiency and therefore improve blood donor wellbeing. Furthermore, iron supplementation will help to maintain an iron-replete blood donor pool. Trial registration EudraCT: 2013-000327-14, Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT01787526 . Registered on 6 February 2013.
机译:背景信息大约有2-3%的人口参加了献血计划。每次全血或十次单采血液采血都会损失200-250毫克的铁。结果,定期献血者最常见的风险之一就是铁缺乏症。尽管这已经知道了几十年了,但是在大多数国家中,目前尚未对该人群中的铁状态进行评估或治疗。绝经前妇女特别容易受到影响,因为她们的铁储量较低,每日需求量较高。除贫血外,铁缺乏症还可能导致疲劳以及认知和身体表现受损。目前用于静脉内给药的铁制剂耐受性良好,并允许一次就诊使用最大剂量为1微克的大剂量。我们的假设是在铁缺乏的献血者中,静脉内补铁比口服补铁更有效,更安全。由于贫血是永久或间歇性供体推迟的最常见原因之一,因此,维持充足的铁供体池可能有助于防止血液供应短缺并避免与铁缺乏相关的合并症。方法/设计在这项随机临床试验中,我们包括年龄≥18岁且≤65岁的男性和女性献血者,铁蛋白值≤30 ng / ml。根据性别分层,使用基于Web的随机工具按1:1的比例将参与者随机分配至1?g静脉内施用的羧甲基麦芽糖铁或10?g富马酸铁补充剂,每次服用1至2天,每天100?mg。首次访视后八至十二周,两组均评估铁质,血球计数和症状。主要终点是两组之间干预后转铁蛋白饱和度的差异(%)。次要终点包括铁代谢和红细胞计数的其他参数,与药物相关的不良事件的患者数量以及主观症状,包括不安腿综合征,生活质量和疲劳。讨论在非贫血但铁缺乏的献血者中静脉内补充铁可代表一种有效的策略,可以保护献血者免受与铁缺乏相关的合并症,从而改善献血者的健康。此外,补铁将有助于维持充足的铁供血池。试验注册EudraCT:2013-000327-14,临床试验标识:NCT01787526。 2013年2月6日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号