...
首页> 外文期刊>The Open Evolution Journal >The Linnaean Hierarchy and 'Extensional Thinking'
【24h】

The Linnaean Hierarchy and 'Extensional Thinking'

机译:Linnaean层次结构和“扩展思维”

获取原文
           

摘要

The Linnaean Hierarchy has been opposed from a number of different perspectives, but most of this oppositionwas based upon the confusion of two aspects of every taxon—extension and intension. These aspects account for its dualnature of simultaneous change and constancy. "Constancy" is apparent only in the differences that exist among groups oforganisms; these differences appear in the very first origin of taxa and persist throughout their entire evolutionary history.The sequence of differences over time is the only basis upon which to judge the history of the organic world. The Linnaeansystem addresses this sequence by attempting to distribute these differences among hierarchical levels. Taxonomichierarchical levels, or ranks, do not imply a rigid adherence to certain kinds of characters, since characters can change their rank during group evolution. As such, taxonomic levels can serve only as a tool to coordinate chaotically segregatedgroups of organisms.
机译:Linnaean层次结构已从许多不同的角度提出了反对,但是这种反对大多数是基于每个分类单元两个方面的混淆-扩展和内涵。这些方面说明了其同时变化和恒定的双重性质。 “恒定性”仅在有机体组之间存在的差异中才可见。这些差异出现在分类单元的最初起源中,并在整个进化史中持续存在。随着时间的推移,差异的顺序是判断有机世界历史的唯一基础。 Linnaeansystem通过尝试在层次结构级别之间分布这些差异来解决此序列。分类系统的等级或等级并不意味着对某些角色的严格遵守,因为角色可以在群体进化过程中改变其等级。因此,分类学水平只能作为协调混乱的生物群的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号