...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Plastic Surgery >Acute Remote Preconditioning Augments Random Skin Flap Survival, But Not Recipient-Bed Isolated Flaps In Rats
【24h】

Acute Remote Preconditioning Augments Random Skin Flap Survival, But Not Recipient-Bed Isolated Flaps In Rats

机译:急性远程预处理可增强大鼠皮瓣的随机存活率,但不能使受者隔离的皮瓣成活

获取原文
           

摘要

This study proposes that acute remote preconditioning (ARIP) can effectively enhance random skin flap survival.The study was a randomized controlled trial using male sprague-Dawley rats as subjects. For acute remote preconditioning, left hindlimb ischemia was achieved by clamping the femoral artery and vein.After 1 hour's ischemia, the limb reperfusion was done for 30 minutes. Then, a 3- by 9- cm dorsal caudal-based, random pattern skin flap was elevated and reaproximated for flap survival studies. Thirty rats were divided into three groups of 10 rats each. The first group had only the flap raised, while the second and third groups had acute remote preconditioning protocol before the flap elevation. In the third group, a silicone sheet was inserted beneath the flap in order to prevent neovascularisation from the bed. The amount of flap necrosis was measured on the seventh postoperative day. ARIP (acute remote ischemic preconditioning) group had the most improved skin flap survival rate, and the flap survival rates between the ARIP+silicone sheet and control groups was not statistically different (p>0.05). These findings indicate that remote ischemic precontioning enhances random skin flap survival, when it is performed just before the flap harvest and the isolation of recipient bed abolishes this ameloriating effect. Introduction Allow for protection of briefly ischemic tissues against the harmful effects of subsequent prolonged ischemia is a phenomennon called as Ischemic Preconditioning (IP). Adaptational responses to Ischemia/Reperfusion (I/R) injury have been demonstrated in different tissue types.There are two distinct types of protection afforded by this adaptational reponse, i.e. acute and delayed preconditioning. The factors that initiate the acute and delayed preconditioning responses appear to be similiar. However, the protective effects of acute preconditioning are protein synthesis independent, while the effects of delayed preconditioning require protein synthesis (1). The inflammatory mediators released as a consequence of reperfusion also appear to activate endothelial cells in remote organs that are not exposed to the initial ischemic insult.This second phenomennon is called as acute remote ischemic preconditioning (ARIP). ARIP has been reported to be succesful for organs such as the heart, kidney and liver (1). Verdouw et al. were the first to report a real remote ischemic preconditioning of the heart by mesenteric artery occlusion in a rat model (2). The protective influence of limb ischemia on myocardial infarction was reported by Birnbaum et al. and Oxman et al. (3,4). Kuntscher et al. showed that ischemic preconditioning and enhancement of flap survival can be achieved not only by preclamping of the flap pedicle, but also by induction of an ischemia/reperfusion event in a body area distant from the flap before harvest (5). The exact mechanism of classic and remote preconditioning has not yet been determined. We aimed to evaluate the effects of ARIP on a different random pattern skin flap model with a different model of limb I/R protocol and the impact of recipient-bed isolation on skin flap survival with remote protection by ischemic preconditioning. Materials And Methods Thirty male Wistar rats weighing between 230 and 335 g were divided into three experimental groups. In the control group (n = 10), caudal-based random skin flaps in adiameter of 3x9 cm were elevated and resutured the original bed with continous subcutaneous 4/0 prolene sutures.In the ARIP group, the same random skin flap elevated just after the completion of 1 hour's ischemia and 30 minutes reperfusion of the left hindlimb.In the ARIP+silicone sheet group, the flap was thereafter sutured back and placed onto a silicone sheet to prevent neovascularization from the wound bed.The flap site was prepared by shaving with electric hair clippers and betadine.Ischemia of the left hindlimb was induced by clamping left femoral artery and vein using A
机译:这项研究建议急性远程预处理(ARIP)可以有效地提高皮肤皮瓣的随机生存率。这项研究是一项以雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠为受试者的随机对照试验。对于急性远距离预处理,通过钳夹股动脉和静脉来实现左后肢缺血。缺血1小时后,进行肢体再灌注30分钟。然后,将3 x 9 cm背侧背侧基于随机图案的皮瓣抬高并重新贴近以进行皮瓣存活研究。将三十只大鼠分成三组,每组十只。第一组仅使皮瓣抬高,而第二和第三组在皮瓣抬高之前进行了急性远程预处理。在第三组中,将硅树脂片插入皮瓣下方,以防止从床中新生血管形成。在术后第七天测量皮瓣坏死的量。 ARIP(急性远程缺血预处理)组的皮瓣存活率改善最大,并且ARIP +硅胶片和对照组之间的皮瓣存活率无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。这些发现表明,在皮瓣收获之前进行远程缺血预处理可以提高皮肤皮瓣的随机生存率,而分离受体床则消除了这种改善作用。简介允许短暂缺血组织免受随后的长时间缺血的有害影响是一种现象,称为缺血预处理(IP)。在不同的组织类型中已经证明了对缺血/再灌注(I / R)损伤的适应性反应。这种适应性反应提供两种不同的保护类型,即急性和延迟预处理。引发急性和延迟预处理反应的因素似乎相似。但是,急性预处理的保护作用与蛋白质合成无关,而延迟预处理的作用则需要蛋白质合成(1)。再灌注后释放的炎性介质也似乎激活了未暴露于初始缺血性损伤的远端器官的内皮细胞。第二现象称为急性远端缺血预处理(ARIP)。据报道,ARIP可成功用于心脏,肾脏和肝脏等器官(1)。 Verdouw等。最早报道在大鼠模型中通过肠系膜动脉闭塞对心脏进行了真正的远程缺血预处理(2)。 Birnbaum等报道了肢体缺血对心肌梗塞的保护作用。和Oxman等。 (3,4)。 Kuntscher等。结果表明,缺血的预处理和皮瓣存活的提高不仅可以通过皮瓣蒂的预紧来实现,而且还可以通过在收获前远离皮瓣的身体部位诱发局部缺血/再灌注事件来实现(5)。经典和远程预处理的确切机制尚未确定。我们旨在评估ARIP对具有不同肢体I / R协议模型的随机图案皮瓣模型的影响,以及通过缺血预处理进行远程保护的隔离床对皮瓣存活的影响。材料与方法将30只体重在230至335 g之间的雄性Wistar大鼠分为三个实验组。对照组(n = 10),抬高直径3x9 cm的基于尾的随机皮瓣,并用连续的4/0皮下连续缝线缝合原床;在ARIP组中,相同的随机皮瓣在术后立即升高完成1小时的缺血和30分钟的左后肢再灌注。在ARIP +硅胶片组中,将皮瓣缝合回来并放置在硅胶片上以防止伤口床新生血管形成。使用电动理发器和甜菜碱。通过使用A钳制左股动脉和静脉来诱发左后肢缺血

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号