...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >Acupuncture for Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Network Meta-Analysis of 33 Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Acupuncture for Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Network Meta-Analysis of 33 Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:针刺肌筋膜疼痛综合征:33随机对照试验的网络Meta分析。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture techniques are commonly used as initial treatments for myofascial pain syndrome.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of different techniques of acupuncture for myofascial pain syndrome.STUDY DESIGN: Network meta-analysis.SETTING: All selected studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs).METHODS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched from their inceptions to February 2016. Only full texts of RCTs comparing acupuncture therapies with any other therapies or placebo-sham acupuncture were included. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. The primary outcomes included pain intensity, PPT, and adverse events. Secondary outcome was physical function.RESULTS: Thirty-three trials with 1,692 patients were included. Patients were allocated to 22 kinds of interventions, of which dry needling and manual acupuncture was the most frequently investigated intervention. Compared with placebo-sham acupuncture, scraping combined with warming acupuncture and moxibustion was found to be more effective for decreasing pain intensity (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -3.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from -5.2 to -2.1); miniscalpel-needle was more effective for increasing the PPT (SMD = 2.2, 95% CI ranging from 1.2 to 3.1); trigger points injection with bupivacaine was associated with the highest risk of adverse event (odds ratio = 557.2, 95% CI ranging from 3.6 to 86867.3); and only EA showed a significant difference in the ROM (SMD = -4.4, 95% CI ranging from -7.5 to -1.3).LIMITATIONS: Lack of clarity concerning treatment periods, repetitive RCTs, and other valuable outcome measurements. The potential bias might affect the judgment of efficacy and safety.CONCLUSIONS: The existing evidence suggests that most acupuncture therapies, including acupuncture combined with other therapies, are effective in decreasing pain and in improving physical function, but additional investigation on the safety of these therapies is required.Key words: Myofascial pain syndrome, acupuncture, anesthesia, efficacy, safety, network meta-analysis, systematic review, randomized controlled trials
机译:背景:针灸技术通常被用作肌筋膜疼痛综合征的初始治疗方法目的:本研究旨在评估和比较不同针刺技术对肌筋膜疼痛综合征的疗效和安全性研究设计:网络荟萃分析设置:全部选定方法:从研究开始到2016年2月,检索Cochrane对照试验中央登记册,PubMed,Web of Science,EMBASE和中国生物医学文献数据库。仅将RCT全文与针灸疗法与包括任何其他疗法或安慰剂-假针灸。两名审稿人独立评估资格并提取数据。主要结果包括疼痛强度,PPT和不良事件。次要结果是身体机能。结果:纳入了1,692例患者的33项试验。患者被分配到22种干预措施中,其中最经常研究的干预是干针刺和手工针刺。与安慰剂假针相比,刮ing结合温热针灸能更有效地减轻疼痛强度(标准平均差(SMD)= -3.6,95%置信区间(CI)在-5.2至-2.1之间) ;微型手术刀针对提高PPT更为有效(SMD = 2.2,95%CI从1.2到3.1);注射布比卡因的触发点与不良事件的风险最高相关(赔率= 557.2,95%CI从3.6到868686.3);并且只有EA在ROM中显示出显着差异(SMD = -4.4,95%CI从-7.5到-1.3)。局限性:关于治疗时间,重复的RCT和其他有价值的结果测量缺乏明确性。结论:现有证据表明,大多数针灸疗法,包括针灸结合其他疗法,均能有效减轻疼痛和改善身体机能,但有关这些疗法安全性的进一步研究关键词:肌筋膜疼痛综合征,针灸,麻醉,疗效,安全性,网络荟萃分析,系统评价,随机对照试验

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号