...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >What Are the Predictors of Altered Central Pain Modulation in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Populations? A Systematic Review
【24h】

What Are the Predictors of Altered Central Pain Modulation in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Populations? A Systematic Review

机译:慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛人群中中枢痛调节改变的预测因素是什么?系统评价

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Altered central pain modulation is the predominant pain mechanism in a proportion of chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders and is associated with poor outcomes. Although existing studies predict poor outcomes such as persistent pain and disability, to date there is little consensus on what factors specifically predict altered central pain modulation. OBJECTIVES: To review the existing literature on the predictive factors specifically for altered central pain modulation in musculoskeletal pain populations.STUDY DESIGN: This is a systematic review in accordance with supplemented PRISMA guidelines.METHODS: A systematic search was performed by 2 mutually blinded reviewers. Relevant articles were screened by title and abstract from Medline, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science electronic databases. Alternative sources were also sought to locate missed potential articles. Eligibility included studies published in English, adults aged 18 to 65, musculoskeletal pain, baseline measurements taken at the pre-morbid or acute stage, > 3-month follow-up time after pain onset, and primary outcome measures specific to altered central pain modulation. Studies were excluded where there were concurrent diseases or they were non-predictive studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the quality in prognostic studies (QUIPS) tool. Study design, demographics, musculoskeletal region, inclusion/exclusion criteria, measurement timelines, predictor and primary outcome measures, and results were extracted. Data were synthesized qualitatively and strength of evidence was scored using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations (GRADE) scoring system.RESULTS: Nine eligible articles were located, in various musculoskeletal populations (whiplash, n = 2; widespread pain, n = 5; temporomandibular disorder, n = 2). Moderate evidence was found for 2 predictive factors of altered central pain modulation: 1) high sensory sensitivity (using genetic testing or quantitative sensory tests), and 2) psychological factors (somatization and poor self-expectation of recovery), at a pre-morbid or acute stage baseline.LIMITATIONS: At the times of the article publications, the current definitions and clinical guidelines for identifying altered central pain modulation were not yet available. Careful interpretation of the information provided using current knowledge and published guidelines was necessary to extract information specific to altered central pain modulation in some of the studies, avoiding unwarranted assumptions.CONCLUSIONS: Premorbid and acute stage high sensory sensitivity and/or somatization are the strongest predictors of altered central pain modulation in chronic musculoskeletal pain to date. This is the first systematic review specifically targeting altered central pain modulation as the primary outcome in musculoskeletal pain populations. Early identification of people at risk of developing chronic pain with altered central pain modulation may guide clinicians in appropriate management, diminishing the burden of persistent pain on patients and heath care providers alike. Systematic Review Registration no.: PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015032394.Key words: Predictive factors, pre-morbid and acute stage baselines, altered central pain modulation, chronic musculoskeletal pain, sensory processing, somatization
机译:背景:中枢性疼痛调节改变是部分慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛性疾病的主要疼痛机制,并与不良预后相关。尽管现有研究预测不良后果,如持续性疼痛和残疾,但迄今为止,关于哪些因素具体预测中枢性疼痛调节改变尚无共识。目的:回顾有关骨骼肌疼痛人群中中央疼痛调节改变的预测因素的现有文献研究设计:这是根据补充的PRISMA指南进行的系统评价方法:由2位互相致盲的评价者进行系统搜索。通过标题和摘要从Medline,Embase,PubMed,CINAHL和Web of Science电子数据库中筛选了相关文章。还寻找其他来源来查找可能遗漏的文章。资格包括以英语发表的研究,18至65岁的成年人,肌肉骨骼疼痛,发病前或急性期进行的基线测量,疼痛发作后> 3个月的随访时间以及针对改变中枢性疼痛调节的主要预后指标。有并发疾病或非预测性研究的研究被排除在外。使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具评估偏倚风险。研究设计,人口统计学,肌肉骨骼区域,纳入/排除标准,测量时间表,预测指标和主要结局指标以及结果均已提取。通过对建议,评估,发展和评估(GRADE)评分系统进行定性综合,对数据进行定性综合评估。结果:共有9篇合格文章位于各种肌肉骨骼人群中(鞭打,n = 2;广泛疼痛, n = 5;颞下颌疾病,n = 2)。中枢疼痛调节改变的2个预测因素的中度证据是:1)患病前病态的感觉敏感性高(使用基因检测或定量感觉检测),以及2)心理因素(躯体化和康复的自我预期较差)局限性:急性期基线或急性期基线。局限性:在本文发表时,尚无用于识别改变的中枢性疼痛调节的当前定义和临床指南。在某些研究中,有必要使用最新知识和已发布的指南仔细解释所提供的信息,以提取特定于改变的中枢性疼痛调制的信息,从而避免不必要的假设。结论:病前和急性期的高感官敏感性和/或躯体化是最强的预测因子迄今在慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛中改变的中枢性疼痛调节。这是第一个专门针对改变的中央疼痛调节作为肌肉骨骼疼痛人群的主要结局的系统评价。尽早识别具有改变中枢性疼痛调制风险的慢性疼痛风险的人,可以指导临床医生进行适当的治疗,从而减轻患者和健康护理人员的持续性疼痛负担。系统评价注册号:PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015032394。关键词:预测因素,病态和急性期基线,中枢痛调节改变,慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛,感觉处理,躯体化

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号