...
首页> 外文期刊>Large-scale Assessments in Education >Same but different? Measurement invariance of the PIAAC motivation-to-learn scale across key socio-demographic groups
【24h】

Same but different? Measurement invariance of the PIAAC motivation-to-learn scale across key socio-demographic groups

机译:相同但不同?关键社会人口群体中PIAAC学习动机量表的度量不变性

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Background Data from the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) revealed that countries systematically differ in their respondents’ literacy, numeracy, and problem solving in technology-rich environments skills; skill levels also vary by gender, age, level of education or migration background. Similarly, systematic differences have been documented with respect to adults’ participation in education, which can be considered as a means to develop and maintain skills. From a psychological perspective, motivation to learn is considered a key factor associated with both skill development and participation in (further) education. In order to account for motivation when analyzing PIAAC data, four items from the PIAAC background questionnaire were recently compiled into a motivation-to-learn scale. This scale has been found to be invariant (i.e., showing full weak and partial strong measurement invariance) across 21 countries. Methods This paper presents further analyses using multiple-group graded response models to scrutinize the validity of the motivation-to-learn scale for group comparisons. Results Results indicate at least partial strong measurement invariance across gender, age groups, level of education, and migration background in most countries under study (all CFI .95, all RMSEA .08). Thus, the scale is suitable for comparing both means and associations across these groups. Conclusions Results are discussed in light of country characteristics, challenges of measurement invariance testing, and potential future research using PIAAC data.
机译:国际成人能力评估计划(PIAAC)的抽象背景数据显示,各国在技术含量高的环境技能中,受访者的素养,计算能力和解决问题的方式存在系统性差异;技能水平也因性别,年龄,受教育程度或移民背景而异。同样,已记录了成年人参与教育方面的系统性差异,可以认为这是发展和维持技能的一种手段。从心理学的角度来看,学习动机被视为与技能发展和参与(进一步)教育相关的关键因素。为了在分析PIAAC数据时考虑到动机,最近将PIAAC背景调查表中的四项内容汇总为学习动机量表。已发现在21个国家中,该量表是不变的(即,显示出完全弱和部分强的测量不变性)。方法本文提出了使用多组分级反应模型的进一步分析,以检验学习动机量表用于组比较的有效性。结果结果表明,在大多数接受研究的国家中,性别,年龄组,受教育程度和移民背​​景之间至少存在部分强烈的测量不变性(所有CFI> .95,所有RMSEA <.08)。因此,该量表适合比较这些组之间的均值和关联。结论根据国家特征,测量不变性测试的挑战以及使用PIAAC数据可能进行的未来研究对结果进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号