首页> 外文期刊>Gynecologic oncology research and practice. >Preference of elderly patients’ to oral or intravenous chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated recurrent ovarian cancer: final results of a prospective multicenter trial
【24h】

Preference of elderly patients’ to oral or intravenous chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated recurrent ovarian cancer: final results of a prospective multicenter trial

机译:严重预处理的复发性卵巢癌患者首选老年患者口服或静脉内化疗:一项前瞻性多中心试验的最终结果

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundPalliative systemic treatment in elderly gynaecological cancer patients remains a major challenge. In recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), treosulfan an active alkylating drug showed similar cytotoxicity whether as oral (p.o.) or intravenous (i.v.) application. The aim of this innovative trial was to evaluate the preference of elderly patients (≥65?years) for p.o. or i.v. chemotherapy focusing compliance, outcome, toxicities, and geriatric aspects as secondary endpoints. MethodsPatients with ROC had the free choice between treosulfan i.v. (7000?mg/m2 d1, q29d) or p.o. (600?mg/m2 daily d1-28, q57d). Only indecisive participants were randomized. ResultsOverall 123 patients with 2nd to 5th recurrence were registered and 119 received at least one cycle of chemotherapy. 85.7% preferred treosulfan i.v. and 14.3% oral, where only three patients were randomized. Main reasons for i.v. preference associated with individual expectations of lower rate of gastrointestinal disorders, higher activity and tolerability of treatment. Median of applied chemotherapies was three (range 1–12 cycles), with most common grade 3/4 toxicities thrombopenia (18.7%), leukopenia (15.7%), ascites (7.6%), bowel obstruction (6.7%), and abdominal pain (4.2%). Median time until progression/overall survival was 5.2/7.8?months (i.v.), and 5.6/10.4?months (p.o.), respectively, without significant differences in efficacy. ConclusionsElderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer asked and demonstrated active participation in the decision-making process of their oncological treatment and favoured predominantly the i.v. application. Treosulfan was generally well-tolerated despite comorbidities and heavy pre-treatment. Our study demonstrates that patients’ preference did not influence prognosis negatively and remains important in gynaecologic oncology decision practice. EudraCT Nr.2004-000719-25; NCT 00170690
机译:背景老年妇科癌症患者的姑息全身治疗仍然是一项重大挑战。在复发性卵巢癌(ROC)中,无论是口服(p.o.)还是静脉内(i.v.)应用,一种活性烷基化药物海洛因都表现出相似的细胞毒性。这项创新试验的目的是评估老年患者(≥65岁)对p.o的偏爱。或i.v.化疗将依从性,结果,毒性和老年性作为次要终点。方法患有ROC的患者可以在i.v. (7000?mg / m 2 d1,q29d)或p.o. (每天d1-28,q57d每天600?mg / m 2 )。仅优柔寡断的参与者被随机分组​​。结果总共登记了123位患者,其中2 至5 复发,其中119例接受了至少一个化疗周期。 85.7%的首选硫丹静脉注射和14.3%的口服药物,其中只有3例患者被随机分组​​。进行i.v.的主要原因个人对胃肠道疾病发生率较低,活动活性和治疗耐受性期望较高的期望相关。所应用化学疗法的中位数为三个(范围为1至12个周期),最常见的3/4级毒性是血栓减少症(18.7%),白细胞减少症(15.7%),腹水(7.6%),肠梗阻(6.7%)和腹痛(4.2%)。直至进展/总体存活的中位时间分别为5.2 / 7.8?月(静脉内)和5.6 / 10.4?月(口服),而疗效无显着差异。结论老年卵巢癌患者在肿瘤治疗的决策过程中表现出积极参与并表现出积极的参与态度,并且主要倾向于静脉输卵管癌。应用。尽管有合并症和严重的预处理,但一般耐受性良好。我们的研究表明,患者的偏好不会对预后产生负面影响,并且在妇科肿瘤学决策实践中仍然很重要。 EudraCT Nr.2004-000719-25; NCT 00170690

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号