...
首页> 外文期刊>Great Plains Research >Book Review of Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage by Laurajane Smith
【24h】

Book Review of Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage by Laurajane Smith

机译:劳拉贾妮·史密斯(Laurajane Smith)的考古理论与文化遗产政治的书评

获取原文
           

摘要

The passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) in 1991 significantly changed the way archaeology would be done in the United States. This act was presaged by growing complaints and resentment directed at the scientific community by Native Americans over the treatment of their ancestral remains. Many of the underlying issues came to a head with the discovery and subsequent court battles over the 9,200-year-old individual commonly known as Kennewick Man. This had a galvanizing effect on the discipline, not only perpetuating the sometimes adversarial relationship between archaeologists and Native Americans, but also creating a rift between those archaeologists who understood Native American concerns and those who saw their ancestral skeletal remains representing the legacy of humankind and thus belonging to everyone. Similar scenarios have emerged in Australia.
机译:1991年通过的《美国原住民坟墓保护和遣返法》(NAGPRA)大大改变了美国进行考古的方式。土著美国人对祖先遗体的处理对科学界的抱怨和不满情绪日益高涨,预示了这一行为。与发现有关的许多基本问题以及随后与9,200岁的通常被称为肯纳威克·曼(Kennewick Man)的人展开的法庭之战。这不仅对考古学产生了积极的影响,不仅使考古学家和美洲原住民之间有时保持对抗性关系,而且在理解了美洲原住民关切的那些考古学家与那些看到祖先的骨骼遗迹代表着人类遗产的考古学家之间造成了裂痕属于每个人。在澳大利亚也出现了类似的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号