...
首页> 外文期刊>Evolutionary Psychology >Kin Investment by Step-Grandparentsa??More Than Expected:
【24h】

Kin Investment by Step-Grandparentsa??More Than Expected:

机译:Step-Grandparentsa的Kin投资计划-超出预期:

获取原文
           

摘要

Asymmetric grandparental caregiving is usually explained by the paternity certainty hypothesis. Accordingly, the lower investment by grandfathers (GFs) and paternal grandparents, as compared to grandmothers (GMs) and maternal grandparents, is based on differential kinship certainty to grandchildren. Hence, differential caregiving by grandparents is equated with their on-average different genetic relatedness to a grandchild. But what about nonbiological grandparents? All else being equal, step-grandparents should not invest highly in step-grandchildren and their investment should not be asymmetric because no differences in kinship certainty exist. However, coresidence with a biological grandparent might enhance step-grandparents' investment. From a total of 508 respondents from Germany and the USA, 108 were step-grandchildren who reported kin caregiving from 151 step-grandparents. Further, we analyzed data of 45 stepparents, 1,005 biological parents, and 1,585 biological grandparents. We identified different types of step-grandparents. Subjects reported step-grandparents who were spouses of biological grandparents (Type I) much more often than step-grandparents who were parents of stepparents (Type II). Investment and emotional closeness ratings for step-grandparents were relatively high, however, on average somewhat lower than that of biological grandparents. Step-GFs provided more caregiving than step-GMs for step-grandchildren. More detailed analyses, however, revealed that this applied only for later partners of biological GMs (Type Ib) who were not already stepparents of the parents (Type Ia). Type Ib step-grandparents generally invested less in step-grandchildren than Type Ia; however, Type Ib maternal step-GFs, by contrast, invested more. Similar to step-GFs, stepfathers also invested more than stepmothers. However, this could be explained by the stepfathers' household connection with their stepchildren. We conclude that mating effort best describes the differential step-GFs' step-grandchild investment.
机译:父母亲确定性假设通常可以解释不对称祖父母的照料。因此,与祖母(GM)和外祖父母相比,祖父(GF)和祖父母的祖父母的投资较低,是基于对孙子女的亲属关系确定性。因此,祖父母的差别照料等同于他们与孙子女的平均不同的遗传关系。但是非生物学的祖父母呢?在所有其他条件相同的情况下,继祖父母不应对继孙子女进行大量投资,并且其投资不应不对称,因为亲属确定性不存在差异。但是,与亲生祖父母的相识可能会增加继祖父母的投资。在来自德国和美国的508位受访者中,有108位是继子女,他们报告了151位继祖父母的亲属照料。此外,我们分析了45位继父母,1,005位生物学父母和1,585位生物学祖父母的数据。我们确定了不同类型的继祖父母。受试者报告作为生物祖父母的配偶的继祖父母(I型)比继父母的继祖父母(II型)要多得多。继祖父母的投资和情感亲密度等级相对较高,但平均水平要低于亲生祖父母。对于继孙子女而言,Step-GF提供的照顾要比Step-GM多。但是,更详细的分析表明,这仅适用于尚未成为父母继母(Ia型)的生物GM(Ib型)的后来伴侣。 Ib型继子祖父母通常在继子孙上的投资要比Ia型少;然而,相比之下,Ib型孕产妇一步生长因子投资更多。与继亲GF类似,继父也比继母投资更多。但是,这可以通过继父与继子女的家庭联系来解释。我们得出的结论是,交配工作最能说明差异化步骤GF的继子孙代投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号