...
首页> 外文期刊>European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. >Retrospective comparison of long-term ten-day/month rifaximin or mesalazine in prevention of relapse in acute diverticulitis
【24h】

Retrospective comparison of long-term ten-day/month rifaximin or mesalazine in prevention of relapse in acute diverticulitis

机译:长期使用利福昔明或美沙拉嗪10个月/月的预防性急性憩室炎复发的回顾性比较

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Diverticular disease (DD) of the colon has an increasing burden on health services. The effectiveness of rifaximin for the treatment of DD, is not yet established. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of long-term treatment with rifaximin or mesalazine in a 10-day schedule for the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study. We identified all consecutive patients with DD and previous acute diverticulitis (AD) in our outpatients’ database; 124 patients, were included. The recommended therapy consisted of a ten-day/month treatment with either rifaximin (400 mg bid), or mesalazine (2.4 g/daily). Primary end point was AD recurrence. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2014, 72 patients were treated with rifaximin and 52 with mesalazine. During a median follow-up of 15 months (range 1-50), we observed 21 episodes of AD among users of either rifaximin (n=7; 0.54 per 100 person-months), or mesalazine group (n=14; 1.46 per 100 person-months). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of recurrent AD significantly differed between rifaximin and mesalazine groups (p=0.015). The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that AD recurrence was significantly associated with therapy (rifaximin vs. mesalazine, adjusted HR 0.27; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.72), age and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with rifaximin in a 10-day schedule appears more effective than mesalazine in preventing recurrent AD.
机译:目的:结肠憩室病(DD)对健康服务的负担日益增加。利福昔明治疗DD的有效性尚未确定。这项研究的目的是评估为预防复发性憩室炎在10天的时间表中长期服用利福昔明或美沙拉嗪的影响。患者与方法:这是一项回顾性研究。我们在门诊患者数据库中确定了所有连续的DD患者和先前的急性憩室炎(AD)患者;包括124名患者。推荐的治疗包括用利福昔明(400 mg bid)或美沙拉嗪(每天2.4 g)进行为期十天/月的治疗。主要终点是AD复发。结果:2010年至2014年,接受利福昔明治疗的患者72例,使用美沙拉嗪治疗的患者52例。在15个月的中位随访期(范围1-50)中,我们观察到利福昔明(n = 7;每100人-月0.54)或美沙拉嗪组(n = 14; 1.46每100人月)。利福昔明组和美沙拉嗪组之间复发性AD的Kaplan-Meier存活率估计存在显着差异(p = 0.015)。多元Cox回归分析显示,AD复发与治疗,年龄和性别(利福昔明与美沙拉嗪,校正后HR 0.27; 95%CI:0.10至0.72)显着相关。结论:利福昔明在10天的疗程中长期治疗似乎比美沙拉嗪在预防AD复发方面更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号