...
首页> 外文期刊>Endocrine journal >The performance of risk scores and hemoglobin A1c to find undiagnosed diabetes with isolated postload hyperglycemia
【24h】

The performance of risk scores and hemoglobin A1c to find undiagnosed diabetes with isolated postload hyperglycemia

机译:风险评分和血红蛋白A1c在孤立负荷后高血糖中发现未被诊断的糖尿病的表现

获取原文
           

摘要

References(34) Cited-By(5) The aim of this study is to develop strategies to screen diabetic subjects with isolated postload hyperglycemia (IPH) in Chinese population. We included 1175 adult subjects who did not report diabetes were included. Diabetes was diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance tests. IPH was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG)95%CI 0.8948-0.9643), 0.9111(95%CI 0.8713-0.9508), 0.8902(95%CI 0.8341-0.9646), 0.8924(95%CI 0.7835-0.8753), and 0.8654(95%CI 0.7963-0.9345) for score 1, 2, 3, 4, and HbA1c, respectively. The sensitivity of all four risk scores to detect IPH was better than that of impaired fasting glucose (IFG). The sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c at cutoff 6.2% for detecting IPH was also better than that of IFG. In conclusion, the risk scores and HbA1c are useful to identify subjects with undiagnosed IPH, with better performance than IFG.
机译:参考文献(34)Cyd-By(5)这项研究的目的是开发策略来筛选中国人群中孤立的负荷后高血糖症(IPH)的糖尿病患者。我们纳入了1175名未报告糖尿病的成人受试者。糖尿病是通过口服葡萄糖耐量试验诊断的。 IPH定义为空腹血糖(FPG)95%CI 0.8948-0.9643),0.9111(95%CI 0.8713-0.9508),0.8902(95%CI 0.8341-0.9646),0.8924(95%CI 0.7835-0.8753)和0.8654 (1、2、3、4和HbA1c得分分别为(95%CI 0.7963-0.9345)。所有四个风险评分检测IPH的敏感性均优于空腹血糖受损(IFG)。 HbA1c在6.2%的临界值下检测IPH的敏感性和特异性也优于IFG。总之,风险评分和HbA1c可用于识别IPH未诊断的受试者,其表现优于IFG。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号