...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences >Achievement Motivation as a Function of Participation, Strive, Willingness to Work and Maintaining Work: Application of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM)
【24h】

Achievement Motivation as a Function of Participation, Strive, Willingness to Work and Maintaining Work: Application of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM)

机译:成就动机与参与,努力,工作意愿和维护工作的关系:结构方程模型(SEM)的应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Achievement Motivation is an interesting topic that should be carefully examined to find its core purpose. Self-report measures of achievement motivation are available, but are embodied in questionnaire measuring variety of personality traits. Researchers often require only the score on an achievement motivation scale, and a less time-consuming method of obtaining such scores is needed. Ellez (2004) proposed a 23-item scale instrument, named Achievement Motive Scale (AMS) , to examine and measure the construct of achievement motivation. The items are intended to measure the students' achievement motive in the size of strive, participation, willingness to work and maintaining the working on a five scores Likert scale. The aim of this article is to study the relationship, formulate a model and test the significance of the four dimensions of the AMS. The survey design was employed involving 295 first and second year senior high school students. Using Hu and Bentler (1999) suggested benchmarks for continuous data, the analysis reported a RMSEA = 0.188 > 0.06, TFI = 0.395 < 0.95, CFI = 0.798 < 0.95, giving an indication the model fit cannot be concluded to be good. The hypothesis that the model is correct was falsified by the application of SEM. Among the four dimensions, participation was statistically insignificant in measuring one’s achievement motivation level. Although, the three other dimensions were identified as significant, the indicator items do not explain much of their variability. This suggests that more other items should be considered to bridge the huge gap of variability left to randomness.
机译:成就动机是一个有趣的话题,应仔细检查以找到其核心目的。可以使用自我报告来衡量成就动机,但是在测量各种人格特质的问卷中都有体现。研究人员通常只要求成就动机量表上的分数,并且需要一种耗时较少的方法来获得这种分数。 Ellez(2004)提出了一项23个项目的量表工具,称为“成就动机量表”(Achievement Motive Scale,简称AMS),用以检验和衡量成就动机的构成。这些项目旨在通过五个得分的李克特量表来衡量学生的成就动机,努力程度,参与程度,工作意愿以及保持工作的动机。本文旨在研究这种关系,建立模型并检验AMS四个维度的重要性。调查设计使用了295名第一和第二年高中学生。使用Hu和Bentler(1999)提出的连续数据基准,分析报告了RMSEA = 0.188> 0.06,TFI = 0.395 <0.95,CFI = 0.798 <0.95,这表明不能得出模型拟合良好的结论。 SEM的应用证明了模型正确的假设。在这四个维度中,参与度在衡量一个人的成就动机水平上没有统计学意义。尽管其他三个维度被认为是重要的,但指标项并不能解释其大部分可变性。这表明应该考虑更多其他项目来弥补随机性带来的巨大差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号