...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications >A Simulation Study on the Strong Neighborhood-Based Stable Connected Dominating Sets For Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
【24h】

A Simulation Study on the Strong Neighborhood-Based Stable Connected Dominating Sets For Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

机译:Ad Hoc网络中基于强邻域的稳定连通控制集的仿真研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We present a detailed simulation based performance study of our recently proposed strong-neighborhood based connected dominating sets (SN-CDS) for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). We compare the performance of SN-CDS with that of the well-known minimum connected dominating sets (MCDS) and the ID-based connected dominating sets (ID-CDS) for MANETs. We show that by computing the SN-CDS involving links that are only within 90% of the maximum transmission range of the nodes, we are able to significantly improve the stability of the CDS (as large as 250%), compared to the MCDS strategy of choosing the minimum number of nodes to cover the entire network. An SN-CDS requires only at most 20% more nodes and has the potential to consume only at most 25% more energy compared to that of a MCDS. On the other hand, the ID-CDS requires 40-70% more nodes and has the potential to consume as large as 140% more energy compared to that of a MCDS. The diameter of an SN-CDS is at most 10% more than that of a MCDS, and the hop count per source-destination path (between any two randomly chosen network nodes) involving the CDS nodes as intermediate nodes is about the same for both the SNCDS and MCDS. Thus, the SN-CDS effectively balances the stability-node size tradeoff and is significantly more stable than that of a MCDS, only at the cost of a minimal to moderate increase in the other performance metrics.
机译:我们为移动自组织网络(MANET)最近提出的基于强邻居的连接控制集(SN-CDS)提供了基于仿真的详细性能研究。我们将SN-CDS的性能与MANET的知名最小连接支配集(MCDS)和基于ID的连接支配集(ID-CDS)进行了比较。我们表明,通过计算仅涉及节点最大传输范围的90%之内的链路的SN-CDS,与MCDS策略相比,我们能够显着提高CDS的稳定性(高达250%)选择覆盖整个网络的最小数量的节点。与MCDS相比,SN-CDS仅需要最多增加20%的节点,并且可能仅消耗最多25%的能量。另一方面,与MCDS相比,ID-CDS需要更多40-70%的节点,并且有可能消耗多达140%的能量。 SN-CDS的直径最多比MCDS的直径大10%,并且将CDS节点作为中间节点的每个源-目的地路径(在任意两个随机选择的网络节点之间)的跳数都大致相同SNCDS和MCDS。因此,SN-CDS有效平衡了稳定性节点的大小折衷,并且比MCDS的稳定性要稳定得多,仅以其他性能指标的最小到中等增长为代价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号