...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Medical Sciences >Evaluation of Pharmacology Didactic Lectures for Graduating Nursing Students: a Questionnaire Based Comparative Study Between Two Colleges in Nepal
【24h】

Evaluation of Pharmacology Didactic Lectures for Graduating Nursing Students: a Questionnaire Based Comparative Study Between Two Colleges in Nepal

机译:护理学研究生药理学讲课评估:基于问卷调查的尼泊尔两所大学之间的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: This study was set to obtain the critical appraisal of the graduating nursing students on pharmacology lectures and to compare the students’ view on teaching effectiveness and pharmacology course content at two different colleges, Kathmandu Medical College (KMC) and B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), in Nepal. Materials and methods: Forty B Sc Nursing students studying at two colleges of twenty each at the end of the first year were enrolled in this study. Structured teaching evaluation questionnaire containing 13 close-ended items and two open-ended questions was used. Three items were intended to evaluate pharmacology course content and other ten items to evaluate the teaching effectiveness. Open-ended questions were incorporated to collect the students frank and open views that provided flexibility and reliability. Students were instructed not to disclose their identity in any form so as to obtain genuine, valid and frank responses. Yates corrected Chi square test was applied whenever necessary and P value considered significant at less than or equal to 0.05. Results: On majority of the students’ (60-90%) view existing pharmacology course content was ‘just right and useful’ and no?significant difference between two college students’ view exists. Majority of students both at Kathmandu Medical College (KMC) and B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS) found the ‘clarity of voice (KMC-55%, BPKIHS-70%) and audibility (KMC-70%, BPKIHS-80%)’ to be ‘fair’. More students at KMC (60%) found the ‘student’s participation’ during lecture than students at BPKIHS (35%). Thirty five percent of students at KMC felt that pace of the lectures was ‘about right’ whereas 100% BPKIHS students found the same and the difference was significant (P=0.00005). Almost all the students both at KMC (95%) and BPKIHS (100%) preferred the liquid crystal display (LCD) mode of presentation has been over head projector (OHP) or board and marker methods. Majority of the students at the both colleges opined that the number of lectures allotted to pharmacology is less. Additionally, from students’?perspective, more student-teacher interactions, class assessments and explanation of the subject matter with clinical correlation are necessary for better understanding of the subject. Conclusion: No major significant differences except pace of the lecture exist in the teaching methodology and pharmacology course content between the two colleges though there are insignificant differences. Students at the both colleges felt that course content of the pharmacology should be increased with more weight to the subject. As per students’ responses, student-teacher interactions during lectures along with more explanations with clinical correlation and more frequent assessment may enhance the students’ learning process and keep up their expectations. Moreover, clarity of voice and audibility need to be improved on teacher’s part during the lectures. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v2i3.4530 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences 2 (2011) 159-163
机译:目的:本研究旨在获得应届护理专业学生对药理学课程的评价,并比较学生对加德满都医学院(KMC)和BP Koirala卫生学院这两家不同学院的教学效果和药理学课程内容的看法科学(BPKIHS),在尼泊尔。资料和方法:本研究招募了40名Bsc护理专业学生,他们在第一年末分别在两所二十所学院中学习。使用结构化的教学评估问卷,其中包含13个封闭项和两个开放性问题。旨在评估药理学课程内容的三个项目,以及旨在评估教学效果的其他十个项目。不限成员名额的问题被纳入,以收集学生的坦率和开放的观点,提供了灵活性和可靠性。指示学生不要以任何形式透露自己的身份,以便获得真实,有效和坦率的答复。必要时应用Yates校正的卡方检验,P值被认为显着小于或等于0.05。结果:大多数学生(60-90%)认为现有的药理学课程内容“恰到好处且有用”,并且两个大学生的观点之间没有显着差异。加德满都医学院(KMC)和BP科伊拉拉健康科学研究所(BPKIHS)的大多数学生都发现“语音清晰度(KMC-55%,BPKIHS-70%)和可听度(KMC-70%,BPKIHS-80% )' 公平起见'。与BPKIHS的学生(35%)相比,KMC的学生在演讲期间发现“学生的参与”的比例更高(60%)。 KMC的学生中有35%的人认为讲课的节奏是“大约正确”,而BPKIHS的100%的学生觉得相同,并且差异很大(P = 0.00005)。几乎所有KMC(95%)和BPKIHS(100%)的学生都更喜欢液晶显示器(LCD)的演示方式已经采用了头顶投影仪(OHP)或纸板和记号笔方法。两所大学的大多数学生认为分配给药理学的讲座数量较少。此外,从学生的角度来看,更多的师生互动,课堂评估以及对具有临床相关性的主题的解释对于更好地理解该主题是必要的。结论:尽管在教学方法和药理学课程内容上的授课速度没有显着差异,但两者之间没有重大差异。两所大学的学生都认为应增加药理学课程的内容,同时增加对该学科的重视。根据学生的反应,讲座期间的师生互动以及更多具有临床相关性的解释和更频繁的评估,可能会增强学生的学习过程并保持他们的期望。此外,在授课过程中,教师必须提高语音清晰度和可听度。 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v2i3.4530亚洲医学杂志2(2011)159-163

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号