...
首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Psychology >“Now you see me, now you don’t”: The assessment of impulsivity
【24h】

“Now you see me, now you don’t”: The assessment of impulsivity

机译:“现在你看到我了,现在你不知道了”:冲动性的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

In the neuropsychological literature, there is a debate concerning whether neuropsychological tests necessarily are better means for assessing impulsivity than are trait measures. Yet, there is an inherent problem in looking at these test results: Cognitive impulsivity (i.e. impulsive performance on a standard task, assessed looking at the speed-accuracy trade-off in the data) might only sometimes be indicative of trait impulsivity, and trait impulsivity might also only sometimes be indicative of cognitive impulsivity. There is, however, no complete overlap. This is the conclusion drawn from two studies reported in this paper. One option is to first look at those participants scoring high on trait impulsivity, and then to interpret their performance on neuropsychological tests in terms of this. Poor performance for them is most likely indicative of impulsive performance. There is, however, another option: That individuals scoring high on trait impulsivity implement this impulsivity in their performance, sometimes performing impulsively, and sometimes not. A plausible solution is to incorporate both self-report and analysis of performance in both neuropsychological assessment and personality research.
机译:在神经心理学文献中,关于神经心理学测验是否比特质测验更好地评估冲动性的方法存在争议。但是,查看这些测试结果存在一个固有的问题:认知冲动(即标准任务的冲动表现,评估数据的速度准确性权衡后进行评估)有时只能表示特质冲动性和特质冲动性有时也只能表示认知冲动性。但是,没有完全重叠。这是从本文报道的两项研究得出的结论。一种选择是首先观察那些在特质冲动方面得分高的参与者,然后以此解释他们在神经心理学测试中的表现。他们表现不佳很可能表示冲动表现。但是,还有另一种选择:在特质冲动上得分高的人会在自己的表现中实现这种冲动,有时表现冲动,有时则不冲动。一个可行的解决方案是将自我报告和绩效分析都纳入神经心理学评估和性格研究中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号