首页> 外文期刊>Breast care >Prospective Biomarker Trials Chemo N0 and NNBC-3 Europe Validate the Clinical Utility of Invasion Markers uPA and PAI-1 in Node-Negative Breast Cancer
【24h】

Prospective Biomarker Trials Chemo N0 and NNBC-3 Europe Validate the Clinical Utility of Invasion Markers uPA and PAI-1 in Node-Negative Breast Cancer

机译:前瞻性生物标志物试验Chemo N0和NNBC-3 Europe验证了淋巴结阴性乳腺癌中侵袭标志物uPA和PAI-1的临床应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are key factors in tumour invasion and metastasis. Increased levels of uPA and/or PAI-1 in primary tumour tissues correlate with tumour aggressiveness and poor patient outcome [1, 2]. In primary breast cancer, Duffy et al. [3] in 1988 were the first to show that high enzymatic activity of uPA in primary breast cancer tissues was correlated with advanced tumour stage and poor clinical outcome. In 1989, Jänicke et al. [4] demonstrated that high uPA antigen levels in primary tumour tissue measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) also predicted poor prognosis. At the same time, it also became apparent that not only antigen levels of uPA but also those of PAI-1 are of prognostic importance in node-negative and node-positive breast cancer patients [4, 5]. Subsequently, many international, mostly European, researchers validated that primary breast cancer patients, and in particular node-negative patients with high tumour tissue antigen content of uPA and/or PAI-1, have a worse probability of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients with low levels of either or both biomarkers [6,7,8,9]. For clinical utility, the combination of uPA/PAI-1 (both low versus either or both high) is superior to either factor taken alone regarding risk group assessment [10]. uPA and PAI-1 render prognostic information independent of established prognostic factors such as tumour size, tumour grade, steroid hormone receptor status, menopausal status [10] and even HER2 status [11,12,13].
机译:尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物(uPA)及其抑制剂纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂1(PAI-1)是肿瘤侵袭和转移的关键因素。原发性肿瘤组织中uPA和/或PAI-1水平升高与肿瘤侵袭性和患者预后不良相关[1,2]。在原发性乳腺癌中,Duffy等人。 [3]于1988年首次证明uPA在原发性乳腺癌组织中的高酶活性与晚期肿瘤分期和不良的临床预后相关。 1989年,Jänicke等人。 [4]证明通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测到的原发性肿瘤组织中高uPA抗原水平也预示了不良预后。同时,对于结节阴性和结节阳性的乳腺癌患者,不仅uPA的抗原水平而且PAI-1的抗原水平对预后都很重要[4,5]。随后,许多国际(主要是欧洲人)研究人员证实,原发性乳腺癌患者,尤其是uPA和/或PAI-1肿瘤组织抗原含量高的淋巴结阴性患者,无病生存(DFS)的可能性更差。生物标志物的总生存率和总生存率均低于低水平的一种或两种生物标志物[6,7,8,9]。对于临床应用,就危险组评估而言,uPA / PAI-1的组合(低或高或低或高)均优于单独使用的任何一个因素[10]。 uPA和PAI-1提供的预后信息与已建立的预后因素无关,例如肿瘤大小,肿瘤等级,类固醇激素受体状态,绝经状态[10]甚至HER2状态[11,12,13]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号