...
首页> 外文期刊>Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy >Progression-free survival/time to progression as a potential surrogate for overall survival in HR+, HER2– metastatic breast cancer
【24h】

Progression-free survival/time to progression as a potential surrogate for overall survival in HR+, HER2– metastatic breast cancer

机译:无进展生存期/进展时间是HR +,HER2-转移性乳腺癌总体生存的潜在替代指标

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Several recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS); however, few have reported improvement in overall survival (OS). The surrogacy of PFS or time to progression (TTP) for OS has not been formally investigated in HR+, HER2– MBC. Methods: A systematic literature review of RCTs in HR+, HER2– MBC was conducted to identify studies that reported both median PFS/TTP and OS. The correlation between PFS/TTP and OS was evaluated using Pearson’s product–moment correlation and Spearman’s rank correlation. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore possible reasons for heterogeneity. Errors-in-variables weighted least squares regression (LSR) was used to model incremental OS months as a function of incremental PFS/TTP months. An exploratory analysis investigated the impact of three covariates (chemotherapy vs hormonal/targeted therapy, PFS vs TTP, and first-line therapy vs second-line therapy or greater) on OS prediction. The lower 95% prediction band was used to determine the minimum incremental PFS/TTP months required to predict OS benefit (surrogate threshold effect [STE]). Results: Forty studies were identified. There was a statistically significant correlation between median PFS/TTP and OS (Pearson =0.741, P =0.000; Spearman =0.650, P =0.000). These results proved consistent for chemotherapy and hormonal/targeted therapy. Univariate LSR analysis yielded an R 2 of 0.354 with 1 incremental PFS/TTP month corresponding to 1.13 incremental OS months. Controlling the type of treatment (chemotherapy vs hormonal/targeted therapy), line of therapy (first vs subsequent), and progression measure (PFS vs TTP) led to an improved R 2 of 0.569 with 1 PFS/TTP month corresponding to 0.78 OS months. The STE for OS benefit was 5–6?months of incremental PFS/TTP. Conclusion: We demonstrated a significant association between PFS/TTP and OS, which may justify the use of PFS/TTP as a surrogate for OS benefit in HR+, HER2– MBC.
机译:背景:最近在激素受体阳性(HR +),人表皮生长因子受体2-阴性(HER2-)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)方面的几项随机对照试验(RCT)已证明无进展生存期(PFS)有显着改善;但是,几乎没有人报告总生存期(OS)有所改善。在HR +,HER2-MBC中尚未正式研究过PFS替代或OS的进展时间(TTP)。方法:对HR +,HER2-MBC中的RCT进行了系统的文献综述,以鉴定报告中位PFS / TTP和OS的研究。使用Pearson的乘积矩和Spearman的秩相关来评估PFS / TTP与OS之间的相关性。进行亚组分析以探讨异质性的可能原因。变量误差加权最小二乘回归(LSR)用于模拟增量OS月份作为增量PFS / TTP月份的函数。探索性分析调查了三个协变量(化学疗法与激素/靶向疗法,PFS与TTP以及一线疗法与二线疗法或更高疗效)对OS预测的影响。较低的95%预测范围用于确定预测OS收益(替代阈值效应[STE])所需的最小增量PFS / TTP月。结果:鉴定出40项研究。中位PFS / TTP与OS之间存在统计学上的显着相关性(皮尔森= 0.741,P = 0.000;斯皮尔曼= 0.650,P = 0.000)。这些结果证明对于化学疗法和激素/靶向疗法是一致的。单变量LSR分析得出R 2 为0.354,其中PFS / TTP增加1个月,对应OS增加1.13个月。控制治疗类型(化学疗法vs激素疗法/靶向疗法),治疗方案(第一疗法与后续疗法)和进展指标(PFS vs TTP)可改善R 2 0.569,其中1 PFS / TTP月对应于0.78 OS个月。 STE为OS带来的好处是PFS / TTP增量增加了5-6个月。结论:我们证明了PFS / TTP与OS之间存在显着关联,这可能证明使用PFS / TTP替代HR +,HER2-MBC中OS的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号