In the reply to his critics and interlocutors, Laclau clarifies his position regarding a series of concepts such as representation, fraternity (or democratic solidarity), identification, signification, affect, extimacy, spectacle and social sedimentation as they arise in or pertain to his theory of âpopulism and populist reasonâ. In the process of those clarifications, Laclau also explains how his views differ from other relevant thinkers such as Hannah Pitkin (on ârepresentationâ), Jurgen Habermas (on ânew social movementsâ), Guy Debord (on âspectacleâ) and Jacques Lacan (on âextimacyâ).View full textDownload full textKeywordsdemand, empty signifier, fraternity, hegemony, populism, representationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.647651
展开▼