...
首页> 外文期刊>Critique >Reflections on Aspects of Marxist Anti-Utopianism
【24h】

Reflections on Aspects of Marxist Anti-Utopianism

机译:对马克思主义反乌托邦主义各方面的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article argues that Marx and Engels' anti-utopianism was consistent and based on objective political and economic criteria. Marx and Engels were critical of the ideas and practices of followers of the early founders of socialist theory. Politically, they argued these followers were sectarian. Theoretically, a utopian understanding of political economy was partial and pseudo-scientific. This explained how the means sectarians promoted for achieving the socialist goal were ineffective. Utopianism consisted of a mismatch between ends and means. It was a form of unrealisable socialism. Marx and Engels did not try to prevent people thinking imaginatively about the classless society of the future. This is a distortion. It originated with Bernstein's revisionism. Stalinism and bourgeois sociology consolidated this misunderstanding. As a result anti-utopian Marxism has appeared to be an inconsistent form of conservative subjectivity.
机译:本文认为,马克思和恩格斯的反乌托邦主义是一致的,并且建立在客观的政治和经济标准之上。马克思和恩格斯批评了社会主义理论的早期奠基者的思想家和实践。从政治上讲,他们认为这些追随者是宗派主义者。从理论上讲,对政治经济学的乌托邦式理解是局部的和伪科学的。这就解释了宗派主义者为实现社会主义目标而提倡的手段是如何无效的。乌托邦主义包括目标和手段之间的不匹配。这是一种无聊的社会主义。马克思和恩格斯并没有试图阻止人们对未来的无阶级社会进行富有想象力的思考。这是一种失真。它起源于伯恩斯坦的修正主义。斯大林主义和资产阶级社会学巩固了这种误解。结果,反乌托邦马克思主义似乎是保守主观主义的一种不一致形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号