...
首页> 外文期刊>Counselling Psychology Quarterly >The relationship between progress feedback and therapeutic outcome in student counselling: A randomised control trial
【24h】

The relationship between progress feedback and therapeutic outcome in student counselling: A randomised control trial

机译:学生咨询中进度反馈与治疗效果之间的关系:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Stimulated by findings that continuous feedback on client progress improves therapy outcomes (Lambert, Whipple, & Smart, 2001a, Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 159-172) and by arguments that any instrument taking more than 5 min to implement is impractical, this study was a randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of session-by-session progress feedback using the ultra-brief Outcome Rating Scale. Method: A between-subjects design was used. Participants (n = 110) were randomly assigned ‘feedback’ or ‘no feedback’ status, and attended one of eight therapists in a university counselling service. Results: The results showed that there was not a significant difference between the feedback and no-feedback conditions. Both conditions improved therapeutically; however, the feedback condition had a greater effect size (0.85 vs. 0.64), suggesting that with a larger sample statistical significance may have been attained. Between the two conditions there was not a significant difference found in participants classified as reliably changed, unchanged, or deteriorated. However, when the clients were divided into groups on the basis of their presenting issue, the clients with anxiety whose therapists used feedback had significantly better outcomes at the end of therapy than the clients whose therapists did not receive the feedback. Conclusion: Contrary to previous studies, the feedback on the client's progression provided to the therapist had only a small effect on improving therapy outcome. The feedback, however, improved outcomes of the clients presenting with anxiety.View full textDownload full textKeywordsfeedback, psychotherapy, randomized controlled trial, treatment effectiveness evaluation, treatment outcomesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2012.662349
机译:目的:受到对结果的持续反馈改善治疗效果的发现刺激(Lambert,Whipple和Smart,2001a,以患者为中心的研究:使用患者结果数据增强治疗效果),咨询与临床心理学杂志,69,159-172 ),并且有论据认为,任何工具都无法实施超过5分钟的时间,因此,这项研究是一项随机对照试验,研究了使用超简短结果评分量表的逐节进度反馈的影响。方法:采用受试者间设计。参与者(n = 110)被随机分配为“反馈”或“无反馈”状态,并参加了大学咨询服务中的八位治疗师之一。结果:结果表明,反馈和无反馈条件之间没有显着差异。两种情况在治疗上都有改善;但是,反馈条件的影响范围更大(0.85对0.64),这表明使用更大的样本可以达到统计学显着性。在这两种情况之间,被归类为可靠变化,不变或恶化的参与者之间没有显着差异。但是,当根据提出的问题将客户分为几类时,治疗师使用反馈的焦虑症患者在治疗结束时的结果要明显好于没有收到反馈的治疗师。结论:与以往的研究相反,提供给治疗师的关于服务对象病情进展的反馈对改善治疗效果影响很小。但是,这些反馈可以改善出现焦虑症的患者的结局。查看全文下载全文关键词反馈,心理治疗,随机对照试验,治疗效果评估,治疗结果netvibes,推特,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2012.662349

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号