...
首页> 外文期刊>Counselling Psychology Quarterly >Counselling psychology and schizophrenia: A critical discursive account
【24h】

Counselling psychology and schizophrenia: A critical discursive account

机译:心理咨询与精神分裂症:重要的话语说明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The diagnosis of schizophrenia does not feature prominently in counselling psychology literature, and there is a distinct lack of empirical research pertaining to how counselling psychologists construct this diagnosis, as well as accounts of their experiences of working with this client group. This study aimed to explore how counselling psychologists in working with schizophrenia, experience the work and construct the diagnosis. Design: A social constructionist branch of discourse analysis known as critical discursive psychology was adopted as the researchers were interested in the organisation of talk, as well as the social and culturally resonant interpretative resources the participants draw upon in research. Method: A version of discourse analysis known as ‘critical discursive psychology’ is used to analyse how eight counselling psychologists talk about and around the diagnosis of schizophrenia in semi-structured interviews. Results: Three main interpretative repertoires will be expanded on in relation to the analysis; Relating to the Individual's Experience; The Therapeutic Relationship - The Contrarian Subject Position and Normalising the Experience - The Egalitarian Subject Position. Conclusion: These findings suggest that although counselling psychologists construct their experiences of working with individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia in a ‘relational’ way (e.g. through relating to the individual's experience and normalising the experience), the dangers of using language that pathologises is always present. This paper concludes with noting the inroads that have been made into an area where counselling psychology has been traditionally underrepresented, and what type of influence this will have on counselling psychology in the future.View full textDownload full textKeywordscounselling psychology, schizophrenia, critical discursive psychology, discourse analysis: relationalRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2012.662785
机译:目的:精神分裂症的诊断在心理咨询心理学文献中并不突出,并且明显缺乏关于心理咨询师如何构造这种诊断的经验研究,以及他们与该客户群合作的经历的说明。这项研究旨在探讨如何指导心理学家治疗精神分裂症,体验工作并构建诊断。设计:由于研究人员对谈话的组织以及参与者在研究中汲取的社会和文化共鸣的解释性资源感兴趣,因此采用了话语分析的社会建构主义分支,即批判性话语心理学。方法:使用一种称为“批判性话语心理学”的话语分析版本来分析八位咨询心理学家在半结构化访谈中如何谈论和围绕精神分裂症的诊断。结果:将在分析方面扩展三个主要的解释性表目;与个人经验有关;治疗关系-反向主体位置和规范化经验-平均主义主体位置。结论:这些发现表明,尽管咨询心理学家以“关系”方式(例如,通过与个人经历相关和规范化经历)来构建与被诊断为精神分裂症的个体合作的经验,但使用语言进行病理学检查的危险是一直存在。本文的结尾指出了在传统上心理咨询所代表的领域中所取得的进展,以及这将对未来的心理咨询产生何种类型的影响。查看全文下载全文关键词心理咨询,精神分裂症,批评性话语心理学,话语分析:relationalRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b” };添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2012.662785

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号