...
首页> 外文期刊>Climate Policy >Cap setting and allowance allocation in China's emissions trading pilot programmes: special issues and innovative solutions
【24h】

Cap setting and allowance allocation in China's emissions trading pilot programmes: special issues and innovative solutions

机译:中国排放权交易试点计划的限额设置和配额分配:特殊问题和创新解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Seven emissions trading scheme (ETS) pilots have been established in China. They have introduced some unique methods to set emissions caps and allocate allowances, different from textbook models and their counterparts in the EU, California, and many other regions. This article provides a detailed introduction to the methods for cap setting and allowance allocation adopted by the pilots, and presents detailed comparisons of these methods. In terms of cap setting, the pilots adopt flexible caps that can be adjusted where necessary, which primarily depends on the outcomes of the bottom-up approach, namely aggregating the allowances allocated to participants. As for allowance allocation, the pilots not only adopt such methods as grandfathering and benchmarking, which are also widely applied in other existing schemes, but also some special methods that require ex post adjustment, such as those based on enterprises' historical emissions intensity (including both physical quantity and added-value intensity) and current production/output. The factors influencing the design are further analysed, including the impacts of theory and experience from foreign systems, concerns about economic development, traditions regarding intensity targets and policy, constraints from data availability and preparation time, tight regulation of the electricity and heat generation sector, and concerns regarding price stability. The practice of pilots presents an improvement opportunity and a challenge for China to further balance the theoretical and practical requirements in ETS design in establishing its national system.Policy relevanceChina is piloting emissions trading in seven regions, as part of efforts to try to rely more on market-based instruments to achieve GHG emissions control targets. All seven pilots have been confronted with special issues in the design process when compared with existing foreign schemes. This article analyses in depth the special issues related to cap setting and allowance allocation and the approaches adopted to address these issues. Flexible cap setting through a bottom-up approach and different types of allocation methods with or without ex post adjustment are adopted in the pilots. The flexible and innovative approaches the pilots have developed could provide useful experience for designing the nationwide ETS in China and promoting emissions trading policy in other parts of the world.
机译:中国已经建立了七个排放交易计划(ETS)试点。他们引入了一些独特的方法来设定排放上限和分配配额,这与教科书模型及其在欧盟,加利福尼亚和许多其他地区的对应模型不同。本文对飞行员采用的限额设置和配额分配方法进行了详细介绍,并对这些方法进行了详细的比较。在上限设置方面,飞行员采用了灵活的上限,可以在必要时进行调整,这主要取决于自下而上方法的结果,即汇总分配给参与者的津贴。在配额分配方面,试点项目不仅采用了“祖父化”和“基准化”等方法,在其他现有方案中也得到了广泛应用,而且还采用了一些事后调整的特殊方法,例如根据企业的历史排放强度(包括物理量和增加值强度)和当前生产/输出。进一步分析影响设计的因素,包括来自国外系统的理论和经验的影响,对经济发展的关注,有关强度目标和政策的传统,数据可用性和准备时间的限制,对电力和热力生产部门的严格监管,以及对价格稳定性的担忧。飞行员的实践为中国在建立国家体系中进一步平衡ETS设计的理论要求和实践要求提供了改进机会和挑战。政策相关性中国正在7个地区试行排放交易,这是尝试更多依赖的努力的一部分。以市场为基础的工具,以实现温室气体排放控制目标。与现有的国外方案相比,所有七个飞行员在设计过程中都面临特殊问题。本文深入分析了与上限设置和津贴分配有关的特殊问题,以及解决这些问题所采用的方法。在试点项目中,采用了自下而上的方式灵活设置上限,以及采用或不采用事后调整的不同类型的分配方法。飞行员所开发的灵活创新的方法可以为设计中国全国范围的碳排放交易体系以及在世界其他地区推广排放交易政策提供有益的经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号