...
首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge journal of economics >Beyond capital fundamentalism: Harrod, Domar and the history of development economics
【24h】

Beyond capital fundamentalism: Harrod, Domar and the history of development economics

机译:超越资本原教旨主义:哈罗德,多玛和发展经济学史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The origins of 'capital fundamentalism'-the notion that physical capital accumulation is the primary determinant of economic growth-have been often ascribed to Harrod's and Domar's proposition that the rate of growth is the product of the saving rate and of the output-capital ratio. However, neither Harrod nor Domar fit in the 'capital fundamentalism' idea. Development planners in the 1950s adapted the growth formula to their own agenda. Most development economists at the time were aware that Harrod's and Domar's growth models addressed economic instability issues, not long-run growth. Harrod eventually applied his concept of the natural growth rate to economic development. He claimed that the growth of developing economies was determined by their ability to implement technical progress. Domar observed that the incremental capital-output ratio was more likely a passive result of the interaction between the propensity to save and technological progress, not a causal factor.
机译:“资本原教旨主义”的起源(即有形资本积累是经济增长的主要决定因素的观念)经常被归因于哈罗德和多马尔的命题,即增长率是储蓄率和产出资本比的乘积。 。但是,哈罗德和多玛都不符合“资本原教旨主义”的思想。 1950年代的发展计划制定者将增长公式调整为适合自己的议程。当时,大多数发展经济学家都意识到,哈罗德(Harrod)和多玛(Domar)的增长模型解决的是经济不稳定问题,而不是长期增长。 Harrod最终将其自然增长率的概念应用于经济发展。他声称,发展中经济体的增长取决于它们实施技术进步的能力。 Domar指出,增加的资本产出比更可能是储蓄倾向和技术进步之间相互作用的被动结果,而不是因果关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号