...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Georgian Academy of Sciences >General Antecedents of Philosophy by Gustav Radbruch
【24h】

General Antecedents of Philosophy by Gustav Radbruch

机译:古斯塔夫·拉德布鲁赫(Gustav Radbruch)的《哲学概论》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

According to Radbruch, legal philosophy is a part of philosophy. He considers it essential to discuss general antecedents of philosophy. He points out that his views are based on the ideas of Windelband, Rickert and Lask. According to Radbruch, our life experience is formed by objective reality which represents a "raw material", and in which reality and value are chaotically intertwined with each other and have unregulated relationship. We apperceive the people and the objects by their values, whether they have or not. He believes that the initial task of mind is the necessity of separating our own "self" from reality, confronting ourselves to it and thus, separate value from reality. Mind learns to turn off its evaluative consciousness or use it purposefully on occasions. Thus, at the beginning we unconsciously create "realm of nature" from chaos, as nature is nothing else than objective reality— a datum at present which is free from evaluation. After the mind determines particular scale of values and their interconnection as a "realm of values" , it opposes the "realm of nature". Considering these general principles, Radbruch argues that justice should be understood within the framework of categories which belong to values. In his opinion, justice is the part of culture, same as the fact which is attributed to values. The notion of justice can be defined as a "datum at present" and its essence is the realization of the idea of justice. As far as the idea of justice belongs to the realm of values, its cognition and examination is feasible only with special evaluative reasoning method. This is the purpose of legal philosophy. As far as justice is concerned as a reality or the element of culture, it is to the subject of "legal theory" research. Radbruch defines legal philosophy as a science concerning legal values. As for the idea of justice, Radbruch perceives it in Kantian viewpoint that is the concept of perfection which we can approach to though cannot be fully attained. It can be the source of positive law making and the criteria of evaluating legal reality.
机译:拉德布鲁赫认为,法律哲学是哲学的一部分。他认为讨论哲学的一般前提至关重要。他指出他的观点基于Windelband,Rickert和Lask的思想。拉德布鲁赫认为,我们的生活经验是由代表“原始材料”的客观现实形成的,其中现实与价值彼此混乱地交织在一起,并具有不受约束的关系。我们通过人和物体的价值来认识他们,无论他们是否拥有。他认为,思想的首要任务是必须将我们自己的“自我”与现实分离,与现实面对,从而将价值与现实分离。心灵学会关闭其评估意识或在某些场合有目的地使用它。因此,一开始我们就无意识地从混乱中创造了“自然界”,因为自然不过是客观现实而已,目前是一个没有评估的数据。在头脑将价值的特定尺度及其相互联系确定为“价值领域”之后,它反对“自然界”。考虑到这些一般原则,拉德布鲁赫认为应该在属于价值范畴的范畴内理解正义。在他看来,正义是文化的一部分,这与价值观念的事实一样。正义的概念可以被定义为“当前的基准”,其实质是正义思想的实现。就正义观念而言,它属于价值领域,只有通过特殊的评估推理方法,对正义的认识和检验才是可行的。这是法律哲学的目的。就正义而言,它是一种现实或文化要素,是“法律理论”研究的主题。拉德布鲁赫将法律哲学定义为一门关于法律价值的科学。至于正义的概念,拉德布鲁赫在康德的观点中认为它是完美的概念,尽管我们不能完全实现它,但是我们可以追求的完美。它可以成为积极立法的源泉和评估法律现实的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号