...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Comparison of a new aspiration needle device and the Quick-Core biopsy needle for transjugular liver biopsy.
【24h】

Comparison of a new aspiration needle device and the Quick-Core biopsy needle for transjugular liver biopsy.

机译:新型经皮穿刺肝穿刺穿刺针头设备与快速芯活检针的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: To evaluate sample adequacy, safety, and needle passes of a new biopsy needle device compared to the Quick-Core biopsy needle for transjugular liver biopsy in patients affected by liver disease. METHODS: Thirty consecutive liver-disease patients who had major coagulation abnormalities and/or relevant ascites underwent transjugular liver biopsy using either a new needle device (18 patients) or the Quick-Core biopsy needle (12 patients). The length of the specimens was measured before fixation. A pathologist reviewed the histological slides for sample adequacy and pathologic diagnoses. The two methods'specimen adequacy and complication rates were assessed. RESULTS: Liver biopsies were technically successful in all 30 (100%) patients, with diagnostic histological core specimens obtained in 30 of 30 (100%) patients, for an overall success rate of 100%. With the new device, 18 specimens were obtained, with an average of 1.1 passes per patient. Using the Quick-Core biopsy needle, 12 specimens were obtained, with an average of 1.8 passes per patient. Specimen length was significantly longer with the new needle device than with the Quick-Core biopsy needle (P < 0.05). The biopsy tissue was not fragmented in any of the specimens with the new aspiration needle device, but tissue was fragmented in 3 of 12 (25.0%) specimens obtained using the Quick-Core biopsy needle. Complications included cardiac arrhythmia in 3 (10.0%) patients, and transient abdominal pain in 4 (13.3%) patients. There were no cases of subcapsular hematoma, hemoperitoneum, or sepsis, and there was no death secondary to the procedure. In particular, no early or delayed major procedure-related complications were observed in any patient. CONCLUSION: Transjugular liver biopsy is a safe and effective procedure, and there was significant difference in the adequacy of the specimens obtained using the new needle device compared to the Quick-Core biopsy needle. Using the new biopsy needle device, the specimens showed no tissue fragmentation and noincrement in major procedure-related complications was observed.
机译:目的:评估与肝病患者经颈静脉肝穿刺活检的快速活检穿刺针相比,新型活检穿刺针设备的样品充足性,安全性和穿刺次数。方法:连续30例患有严重凝血异常和/或相关腹水的肝病患者,使用新的针头设备(18例)或快速核心活检针(12例)进行了经颈静脉肝穿刺活检。在固定之前测量样品的长度。病理学家检查了组织切片,以进行样品充分性和病理诊断。评价了两种方法的标本充分性和并发症发生率。结果:在所有30例(100%)患者中,肝活检技术上均成功,在30例(100%)患者中,有30例获得了诊断性组织学核心标本,总成功率为100%。使用新设备,获得了18个样本,每位患者平均1.1次通过。使用Quick-Core活检针,获得了12个样本,每位患者平均获得1.8次通过。新型针头装置的标本长度明显比快速核心活检针头更长(P <0.05)。使用新的穿刺针头装置不会在任何标本中将活检组织弄碎,但会使用Quick-Core活检针在12个标本中的3个(25.0%)中将组织碎裂。并发症包括3例(10.0%)患者的心律不齐和4例(13.3%)患者的暂时性腹痛。没有囊下血肿,腹膜或脓毒症的病例,手术后无死亡。特别是,在任何患者中均未观察到早期或延迟的重大手术相关并发症。结论:经颈静脉肝穿刺活检是一种安全有效的方法,与使用快速穿刺活检针相比,使用新型针头装置获得的标本的充分性存在显着差异。使用新的活检针装置,标本未显示组织破碎,并且未观察到与主要手术相关的并发症的增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号