...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Results of gastroscope bacterial decontamination by enzymatic detergent compared to chlorhexidine.
【24h】

Results of gastroscope bacterial decontamination by enzymatic detergent compared to chlorhexidine.

机译:与洗必泰相比,用胃镜清洁胃镜细菌的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: To compare the efficacy of enzymatic detergent with chlorhexidine for gastroscope bacterial decontamination. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study was undertaken to evaluate the ability of these 2 agents to achieve high level disinfection in a gastroscope. A total of 260 samples were collected from 5 different gastroscopes. Manual cleaning was done for 10 min with these 2 agents separately (n = 130 each). Then all specimens underwent 2% glutaraldehyde soaking for 20 min. After 70% alcohol was rinsed, sterile normal saline was flushed into each gastroscope channel and 40 mL of sample was collected. The sample was sent for aerobic bacterial culture after membrane was filtered. A colony count greater than 200 cfu/mL was considered significant. RESULTS: The positive culture rate was 4.6% in the enzymatic detergent arm and 3.1% in the chlorhexidine arm. Pseudomonas species were the main organism detected from both groups (60%). Multiple organisms were found from 4 specimens (enzymatic detergent arm = 1, chlorhexidine arm = 3). CONCLUSION: The contamination rate of both types of cleaning solution is equivalent.
机译:目的:为了比较酶促洗涤剂和洗必泰对胃镜细菌净化的功效。方法:进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究,以评估这两种药物在胃镜中实现高水平消毒的能力。从5个不同的胃镜中总共采集了260个样品。分别使用这两种试剂分别进行手动清洁10分钟(每组n = 130)。然后将所有标本都用2%戊二醛浸泡20分钟。冲洗70%的酒精后,将无菌生理盐水冲洗到每个胃镜通道中,并收集40 mL样品。过滤膜后,将样品送至需氧细菌培养。菌落数大于200 cfu / mL被认为是重要的。结果:酶去污剂组的阳性培养率为4.6%,洗必泰组的阳性培养率为3.1%。假单胞菌是两组中检出的主要生物(60%)。从4个样本中发现了多种生物(酶洗涤剂臂= 1,洗必泰臂= 3)。结论:两种清洁溶液的污染率是相等的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号