...
首页> 外文期刊>Biofuels >Pity the poor biofuels policymaker
【24h】

Pity the poor biofuels policymaker

机译:可怜的可怜的生物燃料政策制定者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Biofuels have always been political in the sense that the biofuels industry operates through government subsidies and mandates. In the early years, the three leading biofuels areas — Brazil, the USA and the EU — all used subsidies to promote biofuels, but more recently all three areas have turned to mandates to avoid the budgetary cost of government subsidies. Thus, there has always been government involvement in the sector. Originally in the USA, there were three main objectives of government intervention in the biofuels arena: Promote agricultural and rural development; Reduce GHG emissions; Reduce dependence on foreign oil [1].
机译:就生物燃料行业通过政府补贴和强制性规定来运作而言,生物燃料一直是政治性的。早些年,三个主要的生物燃料领域-巴西,美国和欧盟-都使用补贴来促进生物燃料的发展,但是最近这三个领域都转向了强制性规定,以避免政府补贴的预算成本。因此,政府一直参与该领域。最初在美国,政府在生物燃料领域的干预有三个主要目标:促进农业和农村发展;减少温室气体排放;减少对外国石油的依赖[1]。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Biofuels》 |2013年第3期|259-262|共4页
  • 作者

    Wallace E Tyner;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, Purdue, IN 47907, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号