...
首页> 外文期刊>Avian Pathology >Ascarid infections in laying hens kept in different housing systems
【24h】

Ascarid infections in laying hens kept in different housing systems

机译:饲养在不同房屋系统中的蛋鸡的scar虫感染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence of ascarid infections in Swedish commercial laying hens in 2004 and 2008 following a recent nationwide change to alternative housing systems but before anthelmintics became available. Also, the influence on prevalence of farm and flock characteristics and management was studied in 2004. The results showed that the overall prevalence was significantly higher in 2008 (38%; n = 64/169) compared with 2004 (24%; n = 44/186) (P = 0.001). Ascarid infections were rare in caged flocks, including furnished (enriched) cages, both years (2.4 to 4.3%), and were significantly more common in non-cage systems in both years (16.7 to 48.6% in 2004, and 28.6 to 77.1% in 2008 depending on the housing system). There was no significant difference in prevalence between hens kept on litter indoors and free-range/organic hens. The absence of a hygiene barrier at the entrance of the house or unit increased the risk of infection (P < 0.001), which suggests that parasite eggs were introduced horizontally to the farms. The risk of infection also increased with the age of equipment used in the barn; for example, the risk increased with an odds ratio of 7.5 (95% confidence interval = 2.3 to 25) when comparing equipment 1 year old with equipment ≥7 years old. The results of this study show that ascarid infections may re-emerge following a change to alternative housing. With the impending ban on conventional battery cages in the member states of the European Union, ascarid infections are likely to increase in importance and efficient control options such as hygiene barriers should be implemented on all farms.
机译:本研究旨在调查最近全国范围内对替代住房系统的变更之后,但在驱虫药问世之前,瑞典商业蛋鸡在2004年和2008年的a虫感染率。此外,在2004年研究了对农场和羊群特征及管理流行率的影响。结果表明,与2004年(24%; n = 44)相比,2008年的总体流行率(38%; n = 64/169)明显更高。 / 186)(P = 0.001)。笼养的鸡群,包括带家具的(增高的)笼子,都很少发生虫感染(2.4%至4.3%),并且在非笼养系统中,这两年都更为常见(2004年为16.7%至48.6%,而28.6%至77.1%)取决于住房制度)。室内垫料母鸡和散养/有机母鸡的流行率没有显着差异。房屋或单位入口处没有卫生屏障会增加感染的风险(P <0.001),这表明寄生虫卵是水平引入农场的。感染的风险也随着谷仓中使用的设备的老化而增加。例如,当将1年龄的设备与7年以上的设备进行比较时,风险以7.5的优势比增加(95%的置信区间= 2.3至25)。这项研究的结果表明,在更换替代住房之后,a虫感染可能会再次出现。随着欧盟成员国即将禁止常规电池笼的使用,a虫感染的重要性可能会增加,所有农场均应实施有效的控制措施,例如卫生屏障。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Avian Pathology》 |2010年第6期|p.525-532|共8页
  • 作者

    Désirée S. Jansson;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), SE-751 89, Uppsala, Sweden;

    Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 7009, S;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号