...
首页> 外文期刊>Aslib journal of information management >Participatory design for ontologies: a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas
【24h】

Participatory design for ontologies: a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas

机译:本体参与性设计 - 以定性编码模式开放科学本体论为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose The open science movement calls for transparent and retraceable research processes. While infrastructures to support these practices in qualitative research are lacking, the design needs to consider different approaches and workflows. The paper bases on the definition of ontologies as shared conceptualizations of knowledge (Borst, 1999). The authors argue that participatory design is a good way to create these shared conceptualizations by giving domain experts and future users a voice in the design process via interviews, workshops and observations. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a novel approach for creating ontologies in the field of open science using participatory design. As a case study the creation of an ontology for qualitative coding schemas is presented. Coding schemas are an important result of qualitative research, and reuse can yield great potential for open science making qualitative research more transparent, enhance sharing of coding schemas and teaching of qualitative methods. The participatory design process consisted of three parts: a requirement analysis using interviews and an observation, a design phase accompanied by interviews and an evaluation phase based on user tests as well as interviews. Findings The research showed several positive outcomes due to participatory design: higher commitment of users, mutual learning, high quality feedback and better quality of the ontology. However, there are two obstacles in this approach: First, contradictive answers by the interviewees, which needs to be balanced; second, this approach takes more time due to interview planning and analysis. Practical implications The implication of the paper is in the long run to decentralize the design of open science infrastructures and to involve parties affected on several levels. Originality/value In ontology design, several methods exist by using user-centered design or participatory design doing workshops. In this paper, the authors outline the potentials for participatory design using mainly interviews in creating an ontology for open science. The authors focus on close contact to researchers in order to build the ontology upon the expert's knowledge.
机译:目的是开放式科学运动要求透明和可回收的研究过程。虽然基础设施支持定性研究的这些实践缺乏,但设计需要考虑不同的方法和工作流程。本文基于本体定义为知识的共同概念化(BORST,1999)。作者认为,参与式设计是通过在设计过程中通过面试,研讨会和观察来创建这些共享概念化的好方法。设计/方法/方法本文介绍了使用参与式设计在开放科学领域创建本体的新方法。例如,作为一个案例研究,提出了对定性编码模式的创建。编码模式是定性研究的重要结果,重用可以为开放科学提供巨大潜力,使得定性研究更加透明,增强了编码模式的分担和定性方法教学。参与式设计过程包括三个部分:使用访谈和观察的需求分析,设计阶段伴随着面试和基于用户测试的评估阶段以及访谈。调查结果表明,由于参与式设计,若干积极成果:更高的用户承诺,相互学习,高质量的反馈和本体质量更好。然而,这种方法有两个障碍:首先,受访者的矛盾答案,需要平衡;其次,由于面试规划和分析,这种方法需要更多的时间。实际意义本文的含义从长远来看,分散开放科学基础设施的设计,并将各方涉及多个层面的缔约方。本体设计的原创性/值,使用用户中心的设计或参与式设计进行研讨会存在多种方法。在本文中,作者概述了参与式设计的潜力,主要使用创建开放科学的本体论。作者关注研究人员的密切联系,以便在专家的知识上建立本体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号