...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Review of Accounting >Overseas listing and accounting conservatism: evidence from Chinese H-share companies
【24h】

Overseas listing and accounting conservatism: evidence from Chinese H-share companies

机译:海外上市和会计稳健性:来自中国H股公司的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – The objective of this paper is to examine the incremental effects of overseas listing on earnings conservatism. In particular, it investigates whether mainland Chinese companies listed “overseas” in Hong Kong exhibit a higher degree of earnings conservatism than companies without overseas-listing. Design/methodology/approach – The paper employs the concept of “conditional conservatism” and adopts Basu’s (1997) conservatism model, examining data for Chinese companies overseas listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong as H-shares, to test hypothesis concerned with the difference in the speed with which economic gains and losses are captured in accounting earnings. Findings – The empirical findings indicate that both overseas-listed and China-only-listed Chinese companies demonstrate a minimal degree of earnings conservatism in the earlier sample sub-period. However, companies listed overseas provide a higher degree of earnings conservatism overall. Furthermore, this conservatism becomes statistically significant in the 2006 to 2008 sub-period. Originality/value – The evidence in this study shows that differences in earnings conservatism arise from differential information demands and differential regulations. Hence the findings have direct policy implications for the regulatory agencies in China and Vietnam and in the ex-communist countries further afield such as Russia, the former Soviet Union, and Eastern Europe.
机译:目的–本文的目的是研究海外上市对收益保守性的增量影响。特别是,它调查了在香港上市的“中国内地”公司是否比未在海外上市的公司具有更高的收益保守性。设计/方法/方法–本文采用“有条件的保守主义”概念,并采用Basu(1997)的保守主义模型,研究了在香港联合交易所作为H股在海外上市的中国公司的数据,以检验与假设相关的假设。会计收益中捕捉经济损益的速度差异。调查结果–实证结果表明,在较早的样本子时期中,海外上市和仅在中国上市的中国公司均表现出最低程度的收益保守性。但是,在海外上市的公司总体上提供了更高程度的收益保守性。此外,这种保守性在2006年至2008年这个子期间在统计上变得很重要。原创性/价值–这项研究的证据表明,收入保守性的差异是由于信息要求不同和法规不同而引起的。因此,这些发现对中国和越南以及俄罗斯,前苏联和东欧等更远的前共产主义国家的监管机构具有直接的政策影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号