...
首页> 外文期刊>Archival science >Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism
【24h】

Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism

机译:自决与档案自治:提倡行动主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper explores the role of archival activism in supporting social movements linked to human rights and social justice agendas. Taking a records continuum perspective, it presents an Australian case study relating to the Stolen Generations, Former Child Migrants, Forgotten Australians and Forced Adoption communities to illustrate imperatives for advocacy and activism in support of the "archival autonomy" of communities. Framed by critical theory, the study identifies and analyses systemic problems in meeting the recordkeeping and archival identity, memory, accountability, redress and recovery needs of these key communities. The devastating impact of both finding and not finding relevant information is highlighted, along with how systemic and structural difficulties in seeking access to vital evidence can be re-traumatising. Using reflexivity and the Movement Action Plan as an analytical tool, the case study reflects on the activist role archival research and development projects can potentially play, using the Who Am I? and Trust and Technology Projects as exemplars. The paper explores how an extended suite of rights in records, stretching beyond discovery and access to appraisal, description and disclosure, and linked to records continuum concepts of co-creation and multiple provenance, and the emergent concept of the participatory archive, might support community self-determination in the context of human rights and social justice agendas, with particular reference to the rights of the child. Additionally, the paper explores a new concept of archival autonomy and its relationship to community self-determination. Archival autonomy is tentatively defined as the ability for individuals and communities to participate in societal memory, with their own voice, and to become participatory agents in recordkeeping and archiving for identity, memory and accountability purposes. The achievement of archival autonomy is identified as a grand societal challenge, with the need for archival activism to become an integral part of social movements on a local and global scale. The paper concludes with a proposed National Summit on the Archive and the Rights of the Child, envisaged as a vehicle for archival advocacy and activism leading to transformative action to address social justice and human rights agendas in Australia.
机译:本文探讨了档案行动主义在支持与人权和社会正义议程相关的社会运动中的作用。从记录连续性的角度出发,它介绍了一个与被盗世代,前儿童移民,被遗忘的澳大利亚人和强迫收养社区有关的澳大利亚案例研究,以说明倡导和行动的必要性,以支持社区的“档案自治”。该研究以批判理论为框架,确定并分析了系统性问题,以满足这些关键社区的记录保存和档案标识,记忆,责任,补救和恢复需求。着重指出了发现和未找到相关信息的破坏性影响,以及如何重新寻找寻求重要证据的系统性和结构性困难。该案例研究使用反思性和“运动行动计划”作为分析工具,反映了档案研究和开发项目可以发挥的积极分子作用,使用“我是谁”?和信托与技术项目为例。本文探讨了扩展的记录权利集,如何超越发现和评估,描述和披露的获取范围,并与共同创造和多重出处的记录连续性概念以及参与性档案的新兴概念联系起来,如何为社区提供支持人权和社会正义议程中的自决权,特别是儿童权利。此外,本文还探讨了档案自治的新概念及其与社区自治的关系。档案自主权被临时定义为个人和社区以自己的声音参与社会记忆并成为身份,记忆和责任制目的参与记录保存和归档的能力。档案自治的实现被认为是一项巨大的社会挑战,需要档案行动主义成为地方和全球范围内社会运动的组成部分。该文件以拟议的全国档案和儿童权利国家峰会作为结尾,设想将其作为档案倡导和行动主义的手段,从而导致采取变革性行动来解决澳大利亚的社会正义和人权议程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Archival science》 |2015年第4期|337-368|共32页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for Organisational and Social Informatics, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Caulfield East 3145, Australia;

    Centre for Organisational and Social Informatics, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Caulfield East 3145, Australia;

    Centre for Organisational and Social Informatics, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Caulfield East 3145, Australia;

    eScholarship Research Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Archival activism; Archival autonomy; Participatory archives; Human rights;

    机译:档案行动主义;档案自治;参与档案;人权;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号