...
首页> 外文期刊>Archival science >Agency in the archive: a model for participatory recordkeeping
【24h】

Agency in the archive: a model for participatory recordkeeping

机译:档案中的代理商:参与式记录保存的模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To date, definitions of participatory archiving or participatory recordkeeping have been elusive. The use of the single term ‘participatory’ for disparate and seemingly contradictory activities raises a number of definitional and practical issues. This paper is an attempt to address these issues by describing the various manifestations of such engagement in terms of a consistent framework; answering Huvila’s call for “a model of different degrees of participation in archival contexts” (2011, p. 1). Literary warrant was employed to explore models of participatory recordkeeping, and the ‘ladder of participation’ approach was shown to have a number of shortcomings when applied to recordkeeping informatics. This linear, meta-narrative approach was rejected in favour of a continuum approach to modelling participation. Based on the Records Continuum Model, a Participatory Recordkeeping Continuum Model is proposed that describes the distanciation of participants from the activities represented by records. A number of examples of participatory engagement reported in the literature including community archiving, Archive 2.0 initiatives, traditional researcher engagement, and participatory recordkeeping were examined and successfully described using the model. The paper concludes that any treatment of participatory engagement with records that attempts to solve problems of severe disenfranchisement requires a continuum approach—the Records Continuum Model to deal with the complexity of records and a Participatory Recordkeeping Continuum Model to understand the complexity of participatory agency. The Participatory Recordkeeping Continuum Model can be used to not only situate existing literature, projects, and systems, but to determine future system requirements for participatory engagement.
机译:迄今为止,参与式归档或参与式记录保存的定义还难以捉摸。在不同的,看似自相矛盾的活动中使用“参与式”这个单一术语会引起很多定义和实践问题。本文试图通过一个一致的框架描述这种参与的各种表现来解决这些问题。回应了Huvila的呼吁:“档案环境中不同程度参与的模型”(2011年,第1页)。文学权证被用于探索参与式记录保存的模型,而“参与阶梯”方法在应用于记录保存信息学时显示出许多缺点。拒绝这种线性的,元叙事的方法,而赞成使用连续性方法来模拟参与。基于记录连续体模型,提出了一种参与式记录保持连续体模型,该模型描述了参与者与记录所代表的活动的区别。文献中报道了许多参与参与的示例,包括社区存档,Archive 2.0计划,传统研究人员参与和参与记录保存,并使用该模型成功进行了描述。本文得出的结论是,任何试图解决严重剥夺公民权问题的记录参与式处理都需要一种连续方法:记录连续模型用于处理记录的复杂性,而参与记录保持连续模型用于理解参与机构的复杂性。参与式记录保持连续体模型不仅可以用于定位现有文献,项目和系统,还可以用于确定参与式参与的未来系统要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号