...
首页> 外文期刊>American economic journal >Affirmative Action: One Size Does Not Fit All
【24h】

Affirmative Action: One Size Does Not Fit All

机译:平权行动:一种尺寸并不适合所有人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper identifies a new reason for giving preferences to the dis-advantaged using a model of contests. There are two forces at work: the effort effect working against giving preferences and the selection effect working in favor of them. When education is costly and easy to obtain (as in the United States), the selection effect dominates. When education is heavily subsidized and limited in supply (as in India), preferences are welfare reducing. The model also shows that unequal treatment of identical agents can be welfare improving, providing insights into when the counterintuitive policy of rationing educational access to some subgroups is welfare improving.
机译:本文通过竞赛模型确定了给予弱势群体优惠的新原因。有两种作用力:努力效果对给予偏好不利,选择作用对偏好有利。当教育成本高昂且易于获得时(如在美国),选择效应起主导作用。当教育受到大量补贴且供应有限时(例如在印度),偏好会减少福利。该模型还显示,对同一个代理人的不平等待遇可以改善福利,从而提供洞察力,说明将教育机会分配给某些亚组的反直觉政策何时可以改善福利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American economic journal》 |2016年第2期|215-252|共38页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, The Pennsylvania State University, 523 Kern Graduate Building, University Park, PA 16802, CESifo, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER);

    Faculty of Economic Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Shabolovka 26, 119049 Moscow, Russia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号