首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China
【2h】

Water consumption, grain yield, and water productivity in response to field water management in double rice systems in China

机译:中国双水稻系统对田间水管理的耗水量,粮食产量和水分生产率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rice cultivation has been challenged by increasing food demand and water scarcity. We examined the responses of water use, grain yield, and water productivity to various modes of field water managements in Chinese double rice systems. Four treatments were studied in a long-term field experiment (1998–2015): continuous flooding (CF), flooding—midseason drying—flooding (F-D-F), flooding—midseason drying—intermittent irrigation without obvious standing water (F-D-S), and flooding—rain-fed (F-RF). The average precipitation was 483 mm in early-rice season and 397 mm in late-rice season. The irrigated water for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 263, 340, 279, and 170 mm in early-rice season, and 484, 528, 422, and 206 mm in late-rice season. Grain yield for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 4,722, 4,597, 4,479, and 4,232 kgha-1 in early-rice season, and 5,420, 5,402, 5,366, and 4,498 kgha-1 in late-rice season. Compared with CF, F-D-F consumed more irrigated water, which still decreased grain yield, leading to a decrease in water productivity by 25% in early-rice season and by 8% in late-rice season. Compared with F-D-F, F-D-S saved much irrigated water with a small yield reduction, leading to an increase in water productivity by 22% in early-rice season and by 26% in late-rice season. The results indicate that CF is best for early-rice and FDS is best for late-rice in terms of grain yield and water productivity.
机译:粮食需求增加和水资源短缺使稻米种植面临挑战。我们研究了中国双稻系统中水分利用,谷物产量和水生产率对田间水资源管理的各种模式的响应。在长期的田间试验(1998-2015年)中研究了四种处理方法:连续驱水(CF),驱油-季中干燥-洪水(FDF),驱油-季中干燥-间歇灌溉而无明显死水(FDS)和驱油-雨水喂养(F-RF)。早稻季节的平均降雨量为483 mm,晚稻季节的平均降雨量为397 mm。大米早期的CF,F-D-F,F-D-S和F-RF的灌溉水分别为263、340、279和170 mm,大米后期的灌溉水为484、528、422和206 mm。大米早期CF,FDF,FDS和F-RF的谷物产量分别为4,722、4,597、4,479和4,232 kgha -1 ,以及5,420、5,402、5,366和4,498水稻晚稻期kgha -1 。与CF相比,F-D-F消耗更多的灌溉水,这仍然降低了谷物的产量,导致早稻季的水分生产率降低了25%,而晚稻季的水分生产率降低了8%。与F-D-F相比,F-D-S节省了大量灌溉水,而产量却有小幅下降,从而使水稻早期的水生产率提高了22%,水稻后期的水生产率提高了26%。结果表明,就谷物产量和水分生产率而言,CF最适合早稻,而FDS最适合晚稻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号