首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SSM - Population Health >Pre-school childcare and inequalities in child development
【2h】

Pre-school childcare and inequalities in child development

机译:儿童发展前的学前教育和不平等

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Centre-based childcare may benefit pre-school children and alleviate inequalities in early childhood development, but evidence on socio-emotional and physical health outcomes is limited. Data were from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (n = 14,376). Inverse-probability weighting was used to estimate confounder-adjusted population-average effects of centre and non-centre-based childcare (compared to parental care only) between ages 26–31 months on (age 3): internalising and externalising symptoms, pro-social behaviour, independence, emotional dysregulation, vocabulary, school readiness, and body mass index. To assess impacts on inequalities, controlled direct effects of low parental education and lone parenthood on all outcomes were estimated under two hypothetical scenarios: 1) universal take-up of centre-based childcare; and 2) parental care only. On average, non-centre based childcare improved vocabulary and centre-based care improved school readiness, with little evidence of other benefits. However, socio-economic inequalities were observed for all outcomes and were attenuated in scenario 1 (universal take-up). For example, inequalities in externalising symptoms (according to low parental education) were reduced from a confounder-adjusted standard deviation difference of 7.8 (95% confidence intervals: 6.7–8.8), to 1.7 (0.6–2.7). Inequalities by parental education in scenario 2 (parental care only) were wider than in scenario 1 for externalising symptoms (at 3.4; 2.4–4.4), and for emotional dysregulation and school readiness. Inequalities by lone parenthood, which were smaller, fell in scenario 1, and fell further in scenario 2. Universal access to centre-based pre-school care may alleviate inequalities, while restricted access (e.g. during lockdown for a pandemic such as Covid-19) may widen some inequalities in socioemotional and cognitive development.
机译:中心的儿童保育可能会使学前儿童受益,减轻幼儿发展中的不平等,但有关社会情绪和身体健康结果的证据是有限的。数据来自英国千年队列研究(n = 14,376)。逆概率加权用于估计(仅限26-31个月之间的中心和非中心的儿童保育(仅与父母护理)估计姑息治疗的人口平均效应(年龄3):内部化和外部化症状,Pro-社会行为,独立,情感失调,词汇,学校准备和体重指数。为了评估对不平等的影响,低父母教育和孤独的父母对所有结果的控制直接影响估计在两个假设情景下估计:1)普遍承担中心的儿童保育;和2)只有父母的照顾。平均而言,非中心的儿童保育改善了词汇和中心的护理改善了学校准备,几乎没有其他好处的证据。然而,针对所有结果观察到社会经济不等式,并在情景1(普遍占用)中衰减。例如,外化症状(根据低父母教育)的不等式从7.8(95%置信区间:6.7-8.8)的混淆标准偏差差减少到1.7(0.6-2.7)。情景中的父母教育的不平等(仅限父母护理)比在外表化症状的情况下更广泛(3.4; 2.4-4.4),以及情感失调和学校准备就绪。孤独的父母身份的不平等,其中较小,在情景1中落下,并在情景中进一步下降2.普遍获得基于中心的学前教育,可能减轻不平等,而受限制的访问(例如在Covid-19这样的流行病期间)可能扩大社会间谍和认知发展的一些不等权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号